AI Rate Professor

Communication

Brittany Hubble

COMS293 · COMM120 · COMS130 · COMM180 · COMM130 · COMM110 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

She is a strong choice for students who want a , and grade-friendly communication class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and approachableClear grading criteriaGreat communication coachEasy workloadInspiring lectures
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Hubble as , and strong at building confidence in communication skills.
  • The workload is usually manageable or light, and many students earn A grades without describing the class as stressful.
  • Online reviews remain positive overall but and occasional distant communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most reported grades are A-range, workload is manageable, and if they show effort.

Both formats support an easy A, though online students mention .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly call the , and nonintimidating, even when speeches or debates are required.

Online courses are described as easy and useful, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

as harshly enforced, but participation, workshops, speeches, and debates make showing up useful.

In-person evidence emphasizes participation and workshops, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and effective at building communication confidence.

In-person recommendations are extremely strong, and online reviews .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students describe her as , and fair, with many A grades and .

Format shift

Both formats look grade-friendly, though .

Workload

Light

82/100

Reviews describe barely any , and normal workload.

Format shift

In-person workload appears especially light, while online work is still manageable but .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently , and ability to build speaking confidence.

Format shift

In-person teaching is especially praised, while online teaching is good but less consistent in communication speed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Courses center , and assignments rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and assignments, while , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing , and confidence-building speaking practice.

Main concern

Students should expect participation, speeches, debates, or group work depending on the course.

What students said

“ . Lectures are taught well.”
COMM180
“She taught me how to be comfortable in my speaking skills”
COMS293

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe easy and useful courses with manageable work, but and occasional communication delays.

Main concern

, so students may need to keep moving on assignments independently.

What students said

“Overall her workload is manageable, her curriculum is easy, and the .”
COMM110
“She regularly did not give feedback until after the .”
COMM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, speeches, debates, and projects, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Weekly QuizzesDebate AssignmentsSpeechesProjects

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize speeches, debates, workshops, and projects, but do not clearly prove a .

SpeechesDebatesGroup ProjectsWorkshops
“be prepared to debate in front of class at least a couple of times through the semester”
COMM120
“she does "workshops" about the material during class”
COMM180

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and major debate assignments, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesDebate Assignment
“ ”
COMM120
“The debate assignment .”
COMM120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Her lectures and understand the readings.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“12/10 recommend.”

📚 Workload Ease

82/100

“ . Lectures are taught well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Clear and very approachable.
  • Lectures are taught well.
  • .

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • she inspired me and created a safe space for her students.
  • If I ever had a problem she would always be there.
  • She is one of the most caring and

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Work

  • . just show that you care honestly.
  • Overall her workload is manageable, her curriculum is easy, and the .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

The 15 reviews are consistently positive across several communication courses, though the online sample is smaller.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM1104 reviews
COMM1203 reviews
COMM1303 reviews
COMM1803 reviews
COMS1301 review
Show 1 more courses
COMS2931 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values