AI Rate Professor

Law

Steven Alexander

LAW3476 · LAW15 · LAW3746 · LAWABCD · LAW16 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Take him if you want a serious law class with , but and do not expect an easy course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear lecturesChallenging testsFair gradingLaw experience neededHelpful feedback
  • Recent in-person reviews describe him as , and .
  • The course content is hard and legal background or steady study helps a lot.
  • The single online review is strongly negative and reports confusing explanations and very hard quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and know the material for .

In-person evidence supports hard work for fair rewards, while the and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The legal concepts, readings, forms, and .

, but in-person comments more often say the difficulty is manageable with study.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews stress paying attention to lectures, but they do not clearly prove a .

, while the online review gives no attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most recent in-person students recommend him because , and .

In-person reviews are mostly recommendable, while the lone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Several students call him fair or reasonable, but and one review claims unfair outcomes.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most grading evidence, while the online review focuses on .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention readings, forms, assignments, long tests, and the need to start work early.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe substantial but manageable work, while the online .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

and feedback, though older reviews and the online review report confusion.

Format shift

the single online experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tests, quizzes, and and forms also important.

Format shift

and a , while the online review emphasizes difficult quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed over time but recent comments , and helpful feedback in a difficult law course.

Main concern

and students must keep up with readings and assignments.

What students said

“ , and easy to follow.”
LAW16
“ and long, plus too many chapters .”
LAW16
“Law 16 is not a cakewalk class.”
LAW3476

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only , and very difficult quizzes.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and the way the questions are formed makes it almost impossible to understand what he is asking.”
LAW16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are challenging and sometimes tricky, but .

Challenging TestsMultiple Choice TestsCumulative FinalStudy Guide AllowedDifficult Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, a cumulative final, and a study guide for tests.

Challenging TestsMultiple Choice TestsCumulative FinalStudy Guide Allowed
“He allows a study guide for tests, so listening during lectures is also important!”
LAW16
“ - but only 1 correct answer.”
LAW16
“ .”
LAW16

Online

The online review reports very hard quizzes, but does not clearly prove .

Difficult Quizzes
“ and the way the questions are formed makes it almost impossible to understand what he is asking.”
LAW16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Law 16 is not a cakewalk class. Prof. Alexander is not going to hold your hand, but he teaches in a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ , and easy to follow.”

📚 Course Difficulty

28/100

“the topic he teaches is difficult, and one should be ready to study hard.”

⚖️

62/100

“He is more than reasonable in the way he grades.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Prof. so the class can understand.
  • and his classes are really entertaining for such a complicated topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Law 16 is not a cakewalk class.
  • and long, plus too many chapters .
  • He definitely does not hand you anything, but you have to work for it.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • The tests can be challenging, but the .
  • - but only 1 correct answer.
  • and the way the questions are formed makes it almost impossible to understand what he is asking.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 19 reviews across many years, with consistent evidence that the class is hard but .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

LAW1613 reviews
LAW153 reviews
LAW34761 review
LAW37461 review
LAWABCD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values