AI Rate Professor

Law

Vi Pham

CIS13 · LAW3732 · LAW53708 · LAW3737 · LAW11 · LAW18 · LAW5 · PARA1 · LAW4 · LAW113732 · INTRN1111 · LAW20 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you will , and accept that .

Best fit · Effort For RewardReal-life law examplesTest-heavy gradingParticipation mattersTough but fairMixed responsiveness
  • Many students praise her law lectures for , and professional standards.
  • Grades often depend heavily on exams, so .
  • Online reviews are much more , and feeling on your own.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Good grades are possible with attendance, reading, slides, and , but the .

In-person evidence is more favorable, while online evidence warns that .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Her examples and slides make law concepts understandable, but , and .

In-person students often say examples help, while online students report more self-teaching and less engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and lecture notes are necessary for passing or doing well.

, while online reviews focus more on checking the course calendar and lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

She is recommended by many students who value serious law learning, but and responsiveness prevent a stronger rating.

In-person recommendation is stronger than online recommendation, which is mixed and less reliable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She may offer curves or , but reviews repeatedly warn that exams are heavily weighted and .

Format shift

, and straightforward tests, while online reviews stress exam risk.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Assignments are often limited and manageable, but , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention three exams, assignments, and discussions, while , and attendance.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and knowledgeable, though some call her evasive, boring, or unresponsive.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

as the main grade drivers, with fewer assignments and some participation.

Format shift

, but online students complain more that .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students , and professional toughness.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter, and .

What students said

“Gives great everyday examples, makes class user friendly and easy to understand.”
LAW5
“ .”
LAW5

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between one very positive experience and , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Online students and calendar changes dominate the course.

What students said

“Pretty much on your own.”
LAW5
“ , so be careful.”
LAW5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style is standard to somewhat strict because exams carry major weight, though some reviews mention .

Three ExamsExam-Heavy GradingSlides-Based StudyExtra Credit MentionedNotes Allowed Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe three tests or , and some older notes or .

Three TestsSlides-Based StudyNotes Allowed EvidenceCurve Mentioned
“There were 3 tests and 4 hw.”
LAW5
“She lets ”
LAW5

Online

Online reviews clearly show three exams and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Three ExamsExam-Heavy GradingChanged Exam Answers Mentioned
“3 exams, 4 assignments, 4 discussion posts, and .”
LAW5
“ .”
LAW5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor, and . I respect that. If you have a passion for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She makes law concepts be easy to understand.”

⚖️

58/100

“Only wish because one slip up on a .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“If you have a passion for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Pham lectures with a lot of real-life case examples which is fun.
  • Her lectures are very informational and fun!
  • Her lectures are easy to follow and she is a kind professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Exams and Grades

  • , so be careful.
  • This is not an easy pass by any means, so cheaters beware.
  • Easy A, just study the book and .

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Expectations

  • Attend lectures and .
  • You need to read the material, show up and you will be fine.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-seven reviews across many years provide broad evidence, though older praise and recent online complaints create some time-based variation.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

LAW522 reviews
LAW115 reviews
LAW185 reviews
PARA14 reviews
CIS132 reviews
Show 7 more courses
LAW202 reviews
LAW37322 reviews
INTRN11111 review
LAW1137321 review
LAW37371 review
LAW41 review
LAW537081 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

15

B+ 1 · B 13 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1