AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Taryn Parker

RC174 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless and can learn independently with limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teaching RequiredRude or UnhelpfulPoor Grade UpdatesOverwhelming SlidesHigh Stress
  • Most reviews , and a need to teach yourself.
  • Students repeatedly report rude or dismissive interactions when asking for help.
  • One positive review says effort and participation can lead to success, but it is an outlier.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Passing may be possible with hard study, but , and limited help make an A feel costly.

Online reviews include one A but still report poor support, while and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material feels harder because , and poor explanations.

Both online and in-person evidence point to self-teaching, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention participation and class focus but do not clearly prove a .

Online , while in-person reviews suggest participation matters but not strict enforcement.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

because they describe poor teaching, rude treatment, and little support.

Both formats are negative, with and response delays and in-person reviews emphasizing teaching and attitude.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

The as harsh, but hidden or delayed grades and stress around passing make it feel strict.

Format shift

Online reviews mention late grading, while and high stress.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe lots of , and a self-teaching burden.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and no structure, while and memorization.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews , and leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Both formats are poor, with behavior.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions tests and a .

Format shift

In-person reviews explicitly mention 3 tests and 1 final, while but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, rude behavior, overwhelming slides, and stressful grading visibility.

Main concern

Students report feeling unsupported and discouraged when asking questions.

What students said

“The and .”
RC174
“ .”
RC174

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews , and little structure.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“she didn't grade anything till the very end of the year.”
RC174
“This is a self teaching class by all means.”
RC174

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews confirm tests and a final but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or closed-book rules.

Tests MentionedFinal MentionedTest Errors Reported

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention 3 tests and 1 final, but do not .

3 TestsFinal Exam
“There were 3 tests and 1 final.”
RC174

Online

Online reviews mention test errors but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Test Errors Reported
“made so ”
RC174

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is a self teaching class by all means. Don't expect her to help or .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She didn't even teach, really.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“Seriously consider other options if you're thinking about signing up for any class this instructor teaches.”

📚 Course Challenge

30/100

“The and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach the class for you to learn or get prepared for RT.
  • Not the . She is eager to teach, but doesn't succeed at it.
  • Professor Taryn is thoughtful and caring toward students.

Theme 2

💬 About Support

  • You can't get any help from her and become a target if you "bother" her too much by asking questions.
  • She answer emails really bad and made so .
  • You can't ask any questions because she doesn't want to be bothered.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • This approach made me reconsider pursuing RT.
  • It was just a terrible experience being a student in her class.
  • You'll do well, as long as you try.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is small but recent, detailed, and highly consistent in its negative themes.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

RC1749 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 4