AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Le Gui

MATH40 · MATH165 · MATH170 · MATH80 · GUI37847 · MATH150 · MATH190 · STATS · M150 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
21.62%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid Le Gui unless you are strong in , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast lecturesTest heavyLots of homeworkTough gradingSelf-teaching required
  • Most reviews describe the class as , and .
  • Many students say they had to teach themselves and struggled to get help or clarity.
  • A minority of recent students praise her support and , but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for prepared students, but most comments , and high self-study demands.

Online and , while in-person reviews add more complaints about pace and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content feels difficult because , and many students say .

Online reviews emphasize self-teaching through MyLab or uploaded lectures, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several in-person reviews describe strict attendance rules, limited absences, and penalties for leaving early.

; online reviews do not clearly establish attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because they found the , and hard to pass.

Online reviews are mixed, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Grades are often described as , and limited value from homework.

Format shift

Both formats mention test-heavy grading, with online reviews specifically noting MyLab and quizzes or tests.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and heavy studying.

Format shift

Both online and more consistently intense.

Teaching experience

Awful

23/100

and inadequate help, despite a few strong positive recent reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews are split, while and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Students repeatedly say grades depend heavily on tests and for completion.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly describe rushed , and frequent frustration.

Main concern

Many students say the pace is too fast and the .

What students said

“She goes through lectures too fast, even if you ask to slow down, she won't.”
MATH150
“Worked so hard and spent hours studying for tests and doing the homework and still barely passed.”
MATH150
“Floods you with hw from the textbook and garbage a** WebAssign.”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but lean difficult, with students , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students may need to learn largely from uploaded lectures, the book, or MyLab with limited direct support.

What students said

“I mostly depended on her uploaded lectures to learn the information.”
MATH150
“The whole grade and quizzes.”
MATH150
“From the submit the work.”
MATH165

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because , and grades driven mostly by exams.

Test HeavyOnline Quizzes MentionedWritten Tests MentionedNo Extra Credit Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyOnline Tests MentionedWritten Tests MentionedPop Quizzes Mentioned
“grades and tests.”
MATH150
“ are written in.”
MATH80
“ and you do them in class”
MATH150

Online

Online reviews clearly mention tests, quizzes, and MyLab, but do not clearly .

Test HeavyMyLab MentionedSubmission Process Complaints
“The whole grade and quizzes.”
MATH150
“I have to take a picture of each individual problem to submit for the test.”
MATH165

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Worked so hard and spent hours studying for tests and doing the homework and still barely passed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews across online and , workload, and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

23/100

“She goes through lectures too fast, even if you ask to slow down, she won't.”

🧪

88/100

“grades and tests.”

📚 Workload

18/100

“Floods you with hw from the textbook and garbage a** WebAssign.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is all over the place and unorganized.
  • and the majority of the homework is not based on any class learning.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Worked so hard and spent hours studying for tests and doing the homework and still barely passed.
  • No opportunities.. Have fun failing.
  • The whole grade and quizzes.

Theme 3

✅ Positive Exceptions

  • Professor Le Gui made calculus easy and enjoyable.
  • Her practice exams are very similar to the actual tests, so .
  • She had good lectures and would actively try to help students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is supported by 37 reviews with detailed and consistent complaints across multiple years, despite a small positive cluster.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 525

Course coverage

MATH15021 reviews
GUI378474 reviews
M1502 reviews
MATH1702 reviews
Math1902 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH402 reviews
MATH802 reviews
MATH1651 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

4

D+ 1 · D 2 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 2