AI Rate Professor

Dance

Jonathan Bryant

DANC101 · DANC130B · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Bryant is a good choice for students who want an encouraging dance instructor, but check the section workload because some students report heavy papers.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirational dance teacherMixed workloadEasy grades for somePaper-heavy complaints
  • Positive reviews praise him as inspirational, funny, fair, and caring.
  • Grades often look easy, but one online review and and inconsistent grading.
  • The evidence base is small, so conclusions are less stable than for larger review sets.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most reported grades are A-range and some students call the class very easy, but .

In-person evidence leans easier, while online evidence is split between fair and unexpectedly heavy.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and encouraging, but writing-heavy sections can make the class feel less easy.

In-person reviews more clearly support easy course content, while one online review describes a much heavier workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , and one tag suggests participation may matter.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students recommend or praise him, but the negative and excessive assignments.

, while online reviews are evenly split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

The A-heavy grade pattern suggests manageable grading, but one student calls him a and .

Format shift

but includes one harsh complaint, while online grading evidence is mixed.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Some students call the class easy with few quizzes, while and assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is split, and .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often describe him as inspirational, caring, funny, and effective, but two negative reviews lower confidence.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention papers, videos, quizzes, exams, and writing work.

Format shift

Both formats mention assignment-heavy work, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly praise him as inspirational, funny, and easy, though , and .

Main concern

and inconsistent grading.

What students said

“He is inspirational and I learned a lot in his class and grew stronger and healthier”
DANC130B
“it was a very easy class. you just need the book. and exams.”
DANC101
“All we did was watch videos and write papers.”
DANC101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and one heavy-assignment complaint.

Main concern

Online .

What students said

“Went from normal online class and write its almost comical .”
DANC101
“Loved this teacher ! He was fair and cares about his students learning.”
DANC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is not clearly proven overall, though and exams and another says no study guides were provided.

Few Easy Quizzes and ExamsNo Study Guides MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Few Easy Quizzes and ExamsNo Study Guides Mentioned
“ and exams.”
DANC101
“No study guides are provided for exams.”
DANC101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is inspirational and I learned a lot in his class and grew stronger and healthier”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Loved this teacher ! He was fair and cares about his students learning.”

📚 Workload Split

50/100

“Went from normal online class and write its almost comical .”

⚖️

62/100

“He is not consistent and is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is inspirational and I learned a lot in his class and grew stronger and healthier
  • Loved this teacher ! He was fair and cares about his students learning.
  • So funny

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • it was a very easy class.
  • and exams.
  • Really have to work for a decent grade.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • All we did was watch videos and write papers.
  • Went from normal online class and write its almost comical .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews across a long time span provide limited evidence, and the opinions are meaningfully mixed.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DANC1014 reviews
DANC130B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values