AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

A Avila

MATH40 · MATH165 · MATH230256 · MATH23 · MATH0758 · MATH60 · MATH150 · MATH180 · MATH190 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the book and studying homework problems heavily.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavyTest heavyConfusing teachingMixed by course levelSelf-study needed
  • Recent higher-level math reviews are strongly negative, , and heavy homework.
  • Older lower-level math reviews are much more positive and describe her as helpful and easy to understand.
  • Grades may be possible through self-study because , but students who need strong instruction face risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

39/100

An A is possible for self-directed students who grind homework and book problems, but , and weak instruction make it unreliable.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Lower-level math is often described as easy, but higher-level courses are fast, lecture-heavy, and difficult to learn from.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with difficulty varying mostly by course level rather than format.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews suggest skipping class is risky, lectures run long, and quality is criticized.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recent students often advise against taking her because they find the , and .

All , and recent comments are much more negative than older ones.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grading is risky because several reviews describe tough , and limited .

Format shift

upper-level math comments much stricter than older lower-level comments.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Students mention lots of and quizzes, and cumulative finals in more recent courses.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person, with heavier workload concentrated in MATH150, MATH165, MATH180, and MATH190.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is split, but recent detailed reviews , and poorly connected to exams.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and older introductory reviews are positive while newer higher-level reviews pull the score down.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Multiple reviews say grades depend heavily or , and cumulative finals.

Format shift

All ; there is no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is in person, and the experience is sharply mixed, with older low-level courses praised but recent higher-level courses criticized for poor teaching and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly report boring lectures, confusing explanations, and .

What students said

“Teach yourself + get a tutor.”
MATH165
“ !”
MATH150
“If you can study thr book by yourself you should be fine since the class is pretty straight .”
MATH180

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews mention hard tests, quizzes, a , and no extra sheet of notes, while .

Test HeavyCumulative FinalFew Graded ItemsNo Note Sheet

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe a test-heavy class with , and no extra note sheet, but they do not clearly prove closed-book proctoring rules.

Hard TestsCumulative FinalNo Extra Sheet of NotesGraded By Few Things
“There's lots of exams, and the final is CUMULATIVE.”
MATH165
“ and she .”
MATH190
“Tests only have 9-11 questions and total grade .”
MATH180

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teach yourself + get a tutor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course-level variation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She's a nice lady, but her teaching skills are some of the .”

🧪

30/100

“There's lots of exams, and the final is CUMULATIVE.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaches straight from the book, but .
  • Her lectures are boring and by the book.
  • She will explain things 100 different ways until everyone gets it!

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests and Grades

  • and she .
  • Tests only have 9-11 questions and total grade .
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • If you can study thr book by yourself you should be fine since the class is pretty straight .
  • Unless you are a math wiz, do the homework.
  • GREAT TEACHER!!!! I AM NOT GOOD IN MATH AND SHE REALLY HELPED ME UNDERSTAND MATH AT MATH 23 LEVEL

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 27 in-person reviews span many years and include detailed, repeated themes, though older and newer opinions conflict.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH239 reviews
MATH1806 reviews
MATH1505 reviews
MATH402 reviews
MATH07581 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1651 review
MATH1901 review
MATH2302561 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1