AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Amira Humphrey

ESTU1 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are , and accepting little feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasPoor CommunicationHarsh ToneTime-Consuming WorkAttendance Graded
  • Most students , and confusing organization.
  • The class content is often easy, but grades can feel risky because instructions and .
  • praising lectures while many warn against taking her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

The material can be easy and several students earned A grades, but , and time-consuming assignments make the A feel unreliable.

Online evidence stresses uncertainty and delayed grades, while and mixed grading experiences.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Students often call the class easy, but scattered modules, heavy readings, and .

Online sections seem easier in content but harder to navigate, while and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

In-person reviews clearly say attendance is graded and can lower the grade, while online .

; online reviews do not clearly address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because they describe poor communication, disorganization, harsh tone, and weak support.

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative, while but remain mostly cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grades are often based on few items, posted late, and .

Format shift

Online students mainly report grade uncertainty, while and being dropped or penalized.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Several reviews describe lots of readings, videos, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize chaotic readings and papers, while in-person reviews .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

The dominant pattern , and a harsh or unsupportive tone.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as nearly absent, while but many severe complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and a few graded items rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on module assignments and papers, while and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person feedback is mixed, with some praise for interesting lectures but , and scattered assignments.

Main concern

Attendance and the class feels easy.

What students said

“This professor is unresponsive, unsupportive, and harsh.”
ESTU-1
“ .”
ESTU-1
“The class and lectures are incredibly interesting”
ESTU-1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing , and heavy reading or papers.

Main concern

Students feel unsupported and unsure about grades until late in the course.

What students said

“Took the class online, it felt like there wasn't even a professor.”
ESTU-1
“ ”
ESTU-1
“ .”
ESTU-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears more assignment- and .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyFew Graded ItemsAssignment-Based Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , but they do support participation and .

Participation MattersFew Graded Items
“most of the grade came from classroom participation”
ESTU-1
“ ”
ESTU-1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Graded by few things”
ESTU-1
“doing the ”
ESTU-1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Took the class online, it felt like there wasn't even a professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ just a every week.”

⚖️

28/100

“She makes a simple class overly difficult, rarely posts grades, and ”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Chaotic modules full of articles, books, and long videos that have to be turned into a paper 3 days later”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is unresponsive, unsupportive, and harsh.
  • The class and lectures are incredibly interesting
  • Incompetent. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class but time consuming.
  • You can get an A if you go to her classes.
  • While the class itself is relatively easy, you would have no idea until the end after you were frantically worried if you would pass.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • the course itself was a bit scattered
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent reviews across online and in-person formats give consistent evidence of disorganization, poor communication, and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ESTU-110 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1