AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Roberto Garcia

PHIL101 · PHIL103 · PHIL106 · PHIL5 · PHIL105 · PHIL6 · PHIL3 · PHILOSOPHY103 · PHIL101PHIL3 · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
92.45%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want an engaging professor and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesTest-heavy gradingClear study guidesFunny and caringLow textbook cost
  • Students and strong passion for philosophy.
  • Grades often depend on a , so study guides and lecture notes matter a lot.
  • Most students find the class easy or fair, but Logic and some PHIL103 sections can be more demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students earn high grades with notes, study guides, and basic effort, but a .

Online and students keep up, with online reviews stressing exam dependence slightly more.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Intro philosophy is usually easy to follow because his lectures simplify the material, while Logic and some PHIL103 content are more challenging.

Online intro courses sound very manageable, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say lectures and notes are essential for passing.

, while online reviews focus on completing modules and notes.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students recommend him because he makes philosophy clear, funny, and .

, though online Logic has a few cautionary reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Study guides, occasional , rounding, and high grades suggest lenient outcomes, though some students call grading strict.

Format shift

often, while online reviews include more warnings about few high-stakes tests.

Workload

Light

72/100

Work is usually reading, notes, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and modules, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and one of .

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with online reviews highlighting engaging videos and in-person reviews highlighting live lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Grades are repeatedly described as .

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with online courses often built around quizzes and three unit exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and a strong need to attend and take notes.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Amazing prof! Hilarious and makes lectures enjoyable.”
PHIL106
“Show up and .”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online , and generally manageable quizzes and exams.

Main concern

Online grades can depend heavily on a few exams.

What students said

“His lectures were very engaging and interesting to watch despite being online.”
PHIL101
“There are 3 big exams, he gives a study .”
PHIL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show mostly multiple-choice or guide-based exams that are manageable with notes, but .

Study GuidesMultiple-Choice ExamsTest-Heavy GradingFew Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture notes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Study Guide ExamsLecture-Based TestsTest-Heavy Grading
“ as they follow the study guide verbatim.”
PHIL101
“4 Tests that make up most of grade.”
PHIL106

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, three unit exams, multiple-choice questions, and study guides, but .

Online QuizzesMultiple-Choice ExamsStudy GuidesThree Unit Tests
“There are 3 big exams, he gives a study .”
PHIL101
“ .”
PHIL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Helped me personally get back on the right track.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He makes his lectures fun and genuinely tries to ensure everyone understands the material.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“A ”

📘

72/100

“ , but he gave study guides that were practically direct translations to the exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were fun and engaging without being overwhelming.
  • and his lecture videos are super helpful.
  • Amazing professor. You don't need a textbook either.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The material is easy, and if you have .
  • so while I found them super easy, if you're not a test person this class may not be for you.
  • Logic can be pretty difficult, but he gives you all the resources to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and both formats show a very consistent positive pattern with .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL10123 reviews
PHIL1068 reviews
PHIL101PHIL37 reviews
PHIL1036 reviews
PHIL62 reviews
Show 4 more courses
PHIL1051 review
PHIL31 review
PHIL51 review
PHILOSOPHY1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

35

A+ 9 · A 25 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 4 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1