AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Adalinda Avila

STAT227 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

unless you can self-teach and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesHeavy homeworkSelf-study requiredLong lecturesOnline is easier
  • and homework is excessive.
  • The older online review is much more positive, citing flexibility and .
  • Success appears to depend heavily on prior math knowledge and self-study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A is possible, but comments , and self-study rather than an easy path.

Online has one lenient-grading review, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The content feels challenging because students , and needing prior calculus or pre-calculus.

Online has one easy-class comment, but as harder without strong prior preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy, but .

Online flexibility is mentioned for deadlines, while in-person comments focus on long .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because and the workload feels excessive.

, while online evidence is mixed but too limited to offset the pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One online review says she is lenient, but and low grades.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence leans stricter.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Most reviews repeatedly mention lots of of homework.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, but .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students often say she is nice but and .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and , so assessment appears split between assignments and exams.

Format shift

and a cumulative final more clearly than online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe unclear , and a .

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“ ”
STAT227
“she assigns tons of homework”
STAT227
“Lectures are long and drag out”
STAT227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is mixed, with one review calling the class easy and flexible and another saying she does not teach well.

Main concern

Teaching clarity is .

What students said

“the class is easy and she's very flexible with deadlines”
STAT227
“she can't exactly teach very well I fear”
STAT227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but sheet of notes and a cumulative final.

Cumulative FinalNo Extra NotesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

of notes, and a cumulative final.

Cumulative FinalNo Extra NotesTest Heavy
“no extra sheet of notes for exams, and the ”
STAT227
“Test heavy”
STAT227

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ ”

📚 Workload

18/100

“There is an obscene amount of homework”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she also relies heavily on self study
  • she can't exactly teach very well I fear

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • she assigns tons of homework
  • she assigns way too much HW for her class
  • There is an obscene amount of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Difficulty

  • To pass this class, you must've known some calculus or pre-calc.
  • goes at a fast pace
  • the class is easy and she's very flexible with deadlines

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews are recent and mostly consistent, but only two online reviews limit format-specific confidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

STAT2278 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1