AI Rate Professor

Physical Science

Cheryl Abbani

ANA32 · ANAT30 · ANATOMY32 · ANATOMY30 · LS113 · ANAT32 · PHYSIO31 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
65.22%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you want a and can handle heavy science content with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring professorHeavy science contentExtra creditDisorganized structureSelf-study needed
  • Students often describe her as caring, approachable, and willing to help or offer flexibility.
  • Anatomy and physiology content is genuinely difficult, with heavy studying, reading, and .
  • Reviews split sharply by course and format, with online and some physiology students reporting disorganization and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

High grades are possible through studying, , and lenient supports, but students repeatedly say you must work hard.

Online reviews make the A feel harder through self-teaching, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Anatomy and physiology are content-heavy courses with fast pacing, memorization, and difficult exams.

Online reviews describe compressed and stressful pacing, while but more supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance and participation matter for labs, lectures, and keeping pace, but .

Online , while in-person reviews stress participation and not skipping.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and supportive, though disorganization and hard content create real risk.

, while the two online reviews strongly discourage the class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

She offers , accepts late work in , and is often described as fair or generous.

Format shift

Leniency is supported mostly by in-person reviews, while online reviews mention easier quizzes but .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report , and substantial exam preparation.

Format shift

Online workload is especially heavy and compressed, while but more manageable with support.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Her caring and helpfulness are major strengths, but disorganization and surface-level lectures lower the overall teaching score.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is poor, while but often strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews , and test preparation as major grade drivers.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams and study guides and dropped exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but more positive, often praising her caring style, transparency, , and fair support in hard courses.

Main concern

Students still report disorganization, heavy memorization, and .

What students said

“Professor Abbani really cares about her student and is the sweetest person ever!”
ANAT32
“ A more than her lectures/notes.”
PHYSIO31
“This professor makes you work for your grade.”
ANAT32

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, describing overloaded lectures, many videos, self-teaching, and heavy study demands.

Main concern

Online students felt the workload and pacing were stressful and not well supported.

What students said

“This professor jammed so much into such a little time, it made studying and retaining the information very difficult.”
ANATOMY30
“ unless you're good at teaching yourself.”
ANAT32

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and content-heavy, but some student-friendly supports include , and dropped exams.

Multiple Choice ExamsOpen Note QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesDropped Lowest ExamStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention multiple-choice exams, transparent exam content, study guides, and dropped exams, but .

Multiple Choice ExamsTransparent Exam ContentDropped Lowest ExamStudy Guides
“ and !”
ANA32
“ to know for exams.”
ANAT32
“ .”
PHYSIO31

Online

Online reviews mention fairly easy exams and open-note, open-book quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Open Note QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesFive Exams
“There are a total of 5 exams, fairly easy as well as a and open book.”
ANAT32

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's very understanding, accepts late work. We have exams every few weeks but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Professor Abbani really cares about her student and is the sweetest person ever!”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Work heavy and unorganized. Work's due nearly every day from different chapters.”

⚖️

70/100

“She gave us a lot of which helped us a lot for sure.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support & Character

  • .
  • Professor Abbani is amazing! and answers all your questions, if you ask for help.
  • She adjusted the entire the class three times throughout the semester to suit the class needs.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This professor makes you work for your grade.
  • Anatomy isn't an easy class and this teacher doesn't help one bit.
  • Class is hard simply because physiology concepts are hard to grasp, not because of teacher.

Theme 3

🧪

  • and !
  • to know for exams.
  • A more than her lectures/notes.

Theme 4

💻 About Online Format

  • This professor jammed so much into such a little time, it made studying and retaining the information very difficult.
  • unless you're good at teaching yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five detailed reviews across several years and courses give strong evidence, though the experience varies by course and format.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ANAT328 reviews
PHYSIO317 reviews
ANA323 reviews
ANAT303 reviews
ANATOMY302 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ANATOMY321 review
LS1131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2