AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jacquelyn Sims

PRALG0130 · MATH180 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take her if and fast pacing for clear math instruction, but be cautious if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsFast pacedHeavy homeworkMixed classroom supportCaring but demanding
  • Most and helps struggling students understand.
  • The course is consistently described as fast-paced and .
  • One recent in-person review is strongly negative about classroom support, pacing, and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible with , and cheat sheets in some classes, but the workload and pace make it far from effortless.

Online evidence points to a very hard class, while and heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content is repeatedly described as fast-paced and difficult, even .

Both online and being the strongest warning.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do , though lecture-heavy comments suggest class participation matters.

Neither format clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but the strong negative in-person review and heavy workload create real hesitation.

The online review is positive despite difficulty, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students mention , and , but not broadly generous grading.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most leniency evidence, while the online .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews and tags mention lots of , and a very hard workload.

Format shift

Both formats support a heavy workload, with online calling the class extremely hard and .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Several students call her clear and supportive, but one recent review reports poor help, fast writing, and disorganization.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive but limited, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a take-home Exam 3, suggesting a mix of assessments.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment detail, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and one serious complaint about speed, homework, and lack of help.

Main concern

, and one says she is not helpful with questions.

What students said

“She made everything very simple to understand and math usually isnt my strong suit.”
PRALG0130
“She writes way too fast and doesn't care if you can't keep up.”
MATH-180

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online , and , but the class is extremely hard.

Main concern

The only online review calls it the hardest college class the student had taken.

What students said

“definitely the hardest class i've taken ever in college”
MATH-180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some in-person reviews report student-friendly exam supports like cheat sheets, review time, and a take-home Exam 3, but policies are not fully consistent.

Cheat Sheets AllowedTake-Home ExamExam Review TimeExam Policy Varies

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments support cheat sheets, review time, and a recurring take-home Exam 3, but .

Cheat Sheets AllowedTake-Home ExamExam Review Time
“She allowed us cheat sheets for our Exams and Exam.”
PRALG0130
“Every semester, there's a new reason why Exam #3 is suddenly a take-home.”
MATH-180

Online

The and homework but does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made everything very simple to understand and math usually isnt my strong suit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and assessment style. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“One of the .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“very fast paced”

👍 Recommendation Level

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a and will always ask to make sure the students understand before moving on.
  • She is VERY easy to understand.
  • She's of no help in class, if you ask a question, she'll tell you to figure it out yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • definitely the hardest class i've taken ever in college
  • very fast paced
  • Other than it being fast paced and a lot of homework

Theme 3

📝

  • She allowed us cheat sheets for our Exams
  • Every semester, there's a new reason why Exam #3 is suddenly a take-home.
  • the homework is 20% of your grade but its easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews are available, but they are recent and detailed enough to show consistent workload concerns and mixed teaching experiences.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PRALG01304 reviews
MATH-1802 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1