AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Stephanie Frith

JURN1 · JOUR100 · JOURNALISM1 · JOURN14 · J12 · JOURN6841 · JOUR8 · JOURN1 · JOUR1 · JOURN0425 · JOURN100 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

She is worth considering for serious journalism students who want mentorship and can handle blunt standards.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong Journalism MentorTough GraderHigh StandardsPolarizing PersonalityCareer-Focused Feedback
  • Positive reviews praise , and career preparation.
  • Negative reviews describe her as harsh, hostile, or discouraging when students struggle.
  • , and meeting professional expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students can do fine by attending, rewriting, and keeping up, but and high standards prevent an easy A.

The lone online review sounds easier, while and significant effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The journalism content is manageable, but , and professional expectations make the class moderately demanding.

Online evidence says the class is not difficult if managed well, while to harsh.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation matter for success, especially in discussion and newsroom-style work.

Online evidence emphasizes keeping up, while classes, and participating.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and mentorship, but a sizable group warns about harsh treatment and grading.

The online review is positive, while but include several high-confidence recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Reviews often call her a tough or harsh grader, though rewrites and .

Format shift

, while the single online review does not describe harsh grading.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is steady and sometimes heavy, with assignments, rewrites, news quizzes, and participation expectations.

Format shift

Online workload sounds manageable with enough time, while work.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Her teaching is polarizing because students praise her mentorship and expertise but also report hostility and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive, while and serious personality complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and participation rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

, and rewrites; online exam policy is not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between strong praise for mentorship and strong criticism of .

Main concern

Students who dislike strict grading or .

What students said

“Amazing mentor and instructor!”
JOURN14
“ and often is crushing even if you work hard.”
JOUR8

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The only online review is positive and , and manageable if students keep up.

Main concern

The online evidence is limited to one review, so confidence is low.

What students said

“Her class is not difficult as long as you keep up with the work.”
JOUR8

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but and tests, with one review noting a student-friendly cheat sheet.

News QuizzesEssay TestsCheat Sheet AllowedAssignments and Rewrites

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a one-page cheat sheet, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring policies.

News QuizzesEssay QuestionsOne Page Cheat Sheet
“there are 3 tests and she gives you a one page cheat sheet front and back”
JOURN100
“ .”
JOURN6841

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tough as she is, she prepares you so well for the career field.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and personality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“She is an amazing mentor and is filled with firsthand experience.”

⚖️

35/100

“ and often is crushing even if you work hard.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

62/100

“ , but J11 and J8 under her.”

Theme 1

📰 About Journalism Preparation

  • She prepares you so well for the career field.
  • She leaves you with a really solid Journalism base if .

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades and Work

  • She's a though.
  • She , but it means you get a higher grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • She is a spectacular teacher/advisor, she really works with her students, is understanding and wants them to succeed.
  • Unfortunately very hostile and uninspiring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating uses 23 reviews over a long time span, though some older reviews are brief or vague.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

JOUR14 reviews
JOURN14 reviews
JOURN143 reviews
JOURNALISM13 reviews
JOUR82 reviews
Show 6 more courses
JOURN68412 reviews
J121 review
JOUR1001 review
JOURN04251 review
JOURN1001 review
JURN11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1