AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Cynthia Cervantes

CHD103 · CDEV108 · CD104 · CDEV2189 · CDEV112 · CDEV114 · CDEV104 · CDEV103 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
43.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can manage deadlines independently and are comfortable with group projects and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLate gradingGroup projectsHeavy assignmentsCaring when engagedExtra credit available
  • Students frequently say grades are delayed until very late, sometimes the end of the semester.
  • Experiences are split between caring, engaging instruction and .
  • Grades can be strong, but , and unclear expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn A grades and mention , but , and unclear instructions raise the effort cost.

Online reviews include more easy-class comments but , while as doing the work and attending.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The subject matter is usually manageable, but , and projects make the class less simple.

Online content is often easy but disorganized, while and participate.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as strictly mandatory, but missing class or announcements can hurt because many instructions are verbal.

, while online reviews focus more on communication and assignment posting.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students like her caring side and extra credit, but , and workload.

, while online reviews are more critical about communication and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades are often high and exists, but students also describe strict, arbitrary, or .

Format shift

Online reviews complain more about late and hard grading, while warnings.

Workload

Moderate

43/100

Workload ranges from super easy to heavy, but , and many assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews more often mention constant assignments, while , and attendance.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Students describe her as caring and experienced, but inconsistent communication, disorganization, and .

Format shift

, while online reviews focus on poor accessibility and messy course organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment appears driven , and written assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and and notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more balanced, with praise for her passion and helpful lectures but , and .

Main concern

In-person students need to attend, participate, and .

What students said

“Great Professor. She has lots of experience and is willing to share it with you.”
CDEV114
“There are so .”
CDEV112
“Study and you will pass.”
CDEV103

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but heavily warn about delayed grading, disorganized sites, hard-to-reach communication, and group projects.

Main concern

Online students may not know their real grade until it is too late to improve.

What students said

“She will not grade your entire semester's worth of work until the semester is over.”
CDEV114
“The class is incredibly easy though”
CDEV103
“Prof. Cervantes is wonderful but .”
CDEV112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and otherwise focus more on assignments than high-stakes exams.

Open-note examsQuizzesProjectsDiscussion posts

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

allowed in one course, but do not clearly prove broader exam policy across courses.

Open-note examsFour exams
“ and she will let you use them on the exam.”
CDEV103
“4 exams, and a passion project.”
CDEV103

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, projects, and discussion posts, but do not clearly prove webcam, .

QuizzesProjectsDiscussion posts
“The class consisted of , and .”
CDEV104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She will not grade your entire semester's worth of work until the semester is over.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“I really enjoyed the Professor, personal development meetings and appreciated the time she took to support and encourage each of us.”

⏳

52/100

“You won't be graded until the end of the semester.”

📚 Workload Balance

43/100

“There are so .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has lots of experience and is willing to share it with you.
  • The class was intriguing and engaging.
  • , but conversations are a bit rude in tone and delivery.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is incredibly easy though
  • This is not an easy A do the work and you will be fine.
  • , but the .

Theme 3

👥

  • There is 1 group project fyi and it was not fun.
  • The workload is heavy.
  • Gives multiple opportunities.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty detailed reviews across both formats show consistent patterns around , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CDEV1039 reviews
CDEV1126 reviews
CDEV1145 reviews
CDEV1084 reviews
CDEV1043 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CD1041 review
CDEV21891 review
CHD1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 4 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1