AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alice Martinez

M180 · MATH73 · STAT4063 · MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH150 · MATH180 · CSCI8 · 75 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
65.96%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if and want a structured math class where effort usually pays off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkClear but demandingLate work flexibilityHelpful when approachedTest and quiz heavy
  • Students often learn a lot, but the workload is consistently heavy.
  • , retakes, replacement scores, and .
  • Online reviews are more polarized and more likely to describe the course as overwhelming.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic because , and replacement scores, but most students say it requires steady homework and studying.

Online reviews include both easy-A comments and extreme workload complaints, while as fair preparation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Statistics and math content is not usually described as conceptually easy, but and practice make it manageable for prepared students.

Online accelerated sections sound harder to manage, while as manageable with attendance and homework.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Several in-person reviews say missing or being late hurts performance or points, while online reviews focus .

Attendance strictness is mainly supported by in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and support, but repeated workload complaints keep the recommendation from being universal.

In-person recommendations are stronger overall, while online reviews are and overwhelming.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students cite late work, retakes, completion credit, note sheets, , and score replacement, though some still call her strict.

Format shift

, but online reviews also include more complaints about strictness and grade issues.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and practice are repeatedly described as a lot, sometimes taking many hours per day.

Format shift

Online workload is described as more overwhelming, while but more often viewed as useful practice.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many students praise her clarity, practice structure, and help, but a sizable minority .

Format shift

, while online reviews include stronger complaints about pacing and organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams rather than relying only on one category.

Format shift

Online reviews mention frequent quizzes, homework, labs, and exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students usually describe her as helpful and for tests.

Main concern

The , and studying to avoid falling behind.

What students said

“Gives a lot of homework but overall a great class.”
MATH150
“Easy to pass! Credit for homework. Credit for class work. and exams.”
MATH170
“She does a great job explaining the material, but it literally takes me six hours to finish the , and vocabulary).”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and helpful teaching, but many say the workload can become overwhelming.

Main concern

The online workload can be very heavy, especially in short sessions.

What students said

“There is a lot of , but it helps a lot for exams.”
MATH150
“Work can be turned in late for full credit and as long as you complete everything, it shouldn't be hard to get an A.”
MATH150
“I worked extremely hard for my A.”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

or cheat sheets, and grade recovery options, though the course can still be test heavy.

Cheat Sheets AllowedNotes AllowedRetake QuizzesExam ReplacementReasonable Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly , and as student-friendly exam supports.

Cheat Sheets AllowedNotes Allowed On ExamsLowest Exam ReplacementRetake Quizzes
“ but as long as you study and fill out a cheat sheet that she allows, you're good.”
CSCI8
“She allowed 3 or 4 pages of notes, front AND back on the final.”
MATH150
“Able and exams.”
MATH170

Online

Online reviews clearly mention exams, quizzes, and one external webcam requirement, but .

External Webcam MentionedWeekly Quizzes Or TestsReasonable Exams
“You will need to buy an external web camera though.”
MATH150
“The quizzes and the lectures and hw assigned.”
MATH150
“there is either a every week.”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I was doing hw for hours every day. But the hard work DOES pay off!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She puts every confusing concept into very simple terms, gives , and will replace your lowest exam score with your highest.”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“She expects 30-40 hours of studying per week for this 8 week course.”

⚖️

72/100

“Easy to pass! Credit for homework. Credit for class work. and exams. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures go over everything you need to know.
  • She puts every confusing concept into very simple terms, gives , and will replace your lowest exam score with your highest.
  • Very lazy. Speeds through lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Work can be turned in late for full credit and as long as you complete everything, it shouldn't be hard to get an A.
  • I worked extremely hard for my A.
  • Definitely a lot of hard work but it all pays off bc the easier than the hw).

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is , AND LABS.
  • Lots of homework but necessary for success in the class.
  • This class was a lot of work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

75

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years with detailed and , and teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 515
3 out of 55
2 out of 58
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH15036 reviews
MATH1707 reviews
MATH1802 reviews
CSCI81 review
M1801 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH731 review
MATH801 review
STAT40631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 4 · A 19 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1