AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susanne Bucher

MATH23 · MATH12 · MATH110 · MATH1100654 · MATH130 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a supportive math professor and are willing to keep up with , and exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsCaring and accessibleHomework heavyTest weightedAttendance matters
  • and strong support.
  • , and serious test preparation.
  • One online MATH130 review reports and , so course choice matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with and clear support, but , and exams require consistent effort.

Both formats reward steady work, while the online evidence includes the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, but the material can move quickly and become hard for students weak in algebra or math.

, while online reviews split between easy-to-follow lectures and one confusing heavy course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as formally mandatory, but students say showing up and participating are key to passing.

Online reviews mention participation and following lectures, while performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students recommend her because , and helpful, despite workload and .

Recommendation is strong in both formats, but online confidence is reduced by one severe negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

but not especially lenient because and one student calls her very tough.

Format shift

and clear criteria, while online reviews include the .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention lots of , and important exams, though the workload is manageable when followed consistently.

Format shift

Both formats mention steady lecture and homework demands, with the online MATH130 review describing the heaviest load.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews describe her as , and effective at explaining math.

Format shift

, while online feedback is mostly strong with one major negative exception.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and final as major grade factors alongside homework.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention midterm and , while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and organized notes, with recurring warnings about homework, attendance, and test weight.

Main concern

Falling behind on homework or missing lectures can hurt grades quickly.

What students said

“ a way that you will understand them.”
MATH23
“Showing up to the lectures is important!”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly very positive about accessibility and clear lectures, but one MATH130 review warns of and .

Main concern

Online students still need steady work and .

What students said

“You will do great if you just follow along.”
MATH110
“She is the .”
MATH130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show exams are important and can strongly affect grades, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book proctoring.

Test HeavyMidterm And Final WeightedStudy Required

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as important and weighted, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Test WeightedStudy Notes Helpful
“I do wish that the tests weren't so weighted over the course work.”
MATH130

Online

Online reviews clearly state the midterm and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Midterm And Final WeightedStudy Required
“The midterm and final are worth the most (20% of your grade) so STUDY for them.”
MATH1100654

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ a way that you will understand them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ a way that you will understand them.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“If she is on the roster for a .”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“You need to put in the work to do well in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she just is so well at explaining things and extremely polite
  • There are a lot of lectures, but its very easy to follow along.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The midterm and final are worth the most (20% of your grade) so STUDY for them.
  • dont fall behind on hmwk it will effect you grade!!
  • She is the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She has plenty office hours times so you can always reach her there for extra help.
  • Caring and makes an if you need it.
  • she's been nothing but amazing to me and my peers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years and both formats give detailed, mostly consistent evidence with one notable negative outlier.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1104 reviews
MATH122 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH11006541 review
MATH231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1