AI Rate Professor

Natural Sciences

Ian Jenkins

MEDT1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if , and can tolerate strict deadline and grading risk.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra creditClear directionsNo late workManageable workloadInconsistent grading
  • Online reviews are split between very positive structure and .
  • Getting an A is realistic with directions, , and no procrastination.
  • The small review count makes the overall judgment unstable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is achievable with , and steady weekly work, but and no late work create risk.

Online evidence supports the A path, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material appears manageable but not effortless because students must , and prepare for cumulative exams.

Online reviews provide the course difficulty evidence; the in-person review only comments on demeanor.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules, but online deadlines are strict and .

Online evidence shows strict deadline flexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

He works for organized students, but and a rude in-person report limit the recommendation.

Online recommendations are polarized, and the only in-person review is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

helps, but zeros, no late work, and grading inconsistency .

Format shift

Online reviews carry nearly all grading evidence; the .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Weekly quizzes, discussions, chapters, and cumulative exams create steady work, but one review calls it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews describe a structured weekly workload, while .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, while negative reviews say he does not care or lacks patience.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed, and the .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and cumulative exams.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the assessment structure; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The but became rude and impatient.

Main concern

The only in-person evidence questions his patience with students.

What students said

“ .”
MEDT-1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and serious complaints about caring and grading fairness.

Main concern

Zeros, no late work, and .

What students said

“Workload is very manageable!”
MEDT-1
“receiving zeros has resulted in an F grade in the class”
MEDT-1
“He accepts no late work and you must be very thorough.”
MEDT-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and cumulative exams but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Cumulative examsWeekly quizzesNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or policy.

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and cumulative exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policy.

Weekly quizzesCumulative exams
“2 quizzes and 1 discussion every week.”
MEDT-1
“A cumulative exam about every 4 weeks.”
MEDT-1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He accepts no late work and you must be very thorough.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Professor is accessible and will answer your questions, if any.”

📈 Easy A Path

66/100

“Follow directions, read the chapters, and do the .”

⚖️

35/100

“The inconsistency in fairness and accuracy in assessing the work submitted.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • 2 quizzes and 1 discussion every week.
  • Workload is very manageable!
  • Only two chapters of homework along with two 10 question quizzes due every Saturday.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • receiving zeros has resulted in an F grade in the class
  • He accepts no late work and you must be very thorough.
  • He gave 2 assignments and provides a free textbook.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Professor Behavior

  • SHE DOES NOT CARE IF YOU LEARN OR NOT!!!
  • .
  • Professor is accessible and will answer your questions, if any.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews are available, opinions are polarized, and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MEDT-15 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1