AI Rate Professor

Art

Arnold Martin

ART145 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want creative freedom and feedback, but expect group work and some classroom management risk.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCreative freedomStrong critiquesCaring supportGroup projectsClassroom distractions
  • Most students praise his knowledge, critiques, and freedom in creative projects.
  • All reported grades are A, but as challenging and participation-based.
  • One review strongly criticizes his classroom tone and conflict management.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Every reported grade is an A and resubmissions help, but , and real creative effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The class is accessible and fun, but students still call the and self-directed.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Participation matters and , so skipping likely reduces the class value.

and group work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and detailed critique, despite one strong complaint about classroom tone.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

A grades across all reviews and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Projects are described as fun and rewarding but also challenging and participation-heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise his knowledge and critiques, while one review reports sarcastic and distracting behavior.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Comments focus on projects, critiques, group work, and resubmissions rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, critiques, and support, with one serious complaint about tone.

Main concern

A negative review says classroom interactions became annoying and distracting.

What students said

“allowed students more creative freedom than in any other creative class I've taken.”
ART145
“Def one of .”
ART145
“listening to the teacher loudly, snidely, and sarcastically talk down to students”
ART145

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critiques but do not clearly prove an .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has a wide range of knowledge across many applications in art, design, and software.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He has a wide range of knowledge across many applications in art, design, and software.”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“ .”

⚠️ Main Concern

35/100

“listening to the teacher loudly, snidely, and sarcastically talk down to students”

Theme 1

🎨 About Creative Work

  • allowed students more creative freedom than in any other creative class I've taken.
  • The , and challenging.

Theme 2

💬

  • gave great critiques & suggestions.
  • Allowed us to re-submit work after getting critiques

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • Some classmates were
  • learn how to be more mature than them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

and mostly consistent, but the sample is small with one sharp outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1454 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values