AI Rate Professor

Law

Dagmar Halamka

LAW · LAW6 · LAW5 · BUSLAW · LAW4 · LAW5LAW6 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her for engaging law learning and real-world examples, but be ready for uneven organization and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMemorable lecturesLaw passionTake-home examsInconsistent organizationAttendance issues
  • Many students , and one of .
  • Law content and , but , and homework alignment often help grades.
  • Older reviews repeatedly mention missed classes, disorganization, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Grades , and doing homework, but students still report hard tests and required reading.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

Her examples make law understandable and fun for many students, but law material, reading, and as tough.

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person law courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Coming to class and keeping up with reading and though some reviews say she missed classes.

and class presence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her for , and practical legal examples despite consistency concerns.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and homework-aligned tests suggest leniency, but some students call tests hard or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Homework and reading are steady and sometimes time-consuming, but several students describe the work as easy if completed.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is often described as inspiring and memorable, but repeated complaints about absences and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment appears to , and finals.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly polarized but mostly positive, praising her passion and examples while , and organization.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistency in , and .

What students said

“ .”
BUSLAW
“Exam one in class and the .”
LAW5
“Horrible at teaching, misses class WAY too much, and .”
LAW5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed but generally student-friendly because , and homework-aligned tests.

Take-Home ExamIn-Class ExamCurved ExamsHard TestsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention take-home exams and , and one COVID-era switch to difficult essays.

Take-Home FinalTake-Home ExamIn-Class ExamCurved ExamsEssay FormatHard Tests
“Exam one in class and the .”
LAW5
“ !!!! :-)”
BUSLAW
“our final ended up being 40% of our overall grade.”
LAW4
“ ”
LAW5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and consistency. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Many examples to illustrate law.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ .”

⚖️

72/100

“Not only does she give , but she also grades on a curve.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she created my love for the law and it's processes.
  • She relates real-life topics with her lectures, allowing difficult material to be understood.
  • she keeps the class light and fun because she TRULY cares about everyone.

Theme 2

📚

  • Law in general is tough material, but .
  • and have many long questions
  • and the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Consistency

  • Not the .
  • she is absent most of the time.
  • misses class WAY too much

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

, but older comments and polarized experiences reduce precision.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

LAW533 reviews
LAW46 reviews
BUSLAW3 reviews
LAW2 reviews
LAW5LAW61 review
Show 1 more courses
LAW61 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1