AI Rate Professor

English

Rhea Lewitzki

ENG24A · ENGLISH82 · ENG1A · POETRY1 · ENGL1A4600 · 1C · ENGL1A6133 · ENG82 · 1A · ENGL6125 · HUMA1 · ENGL826054 · COS126 · ENGL24A · ENG84 · ENG1C · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
84.38%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with readings, papers, and feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring feedbackClear criteriaWriting heavyLenient supportEngaging lectures
  • Most students describe Lewitzki as , and unusually encouraging.
  • Grades are attainable with consistent writing, reading, and following assignment criteria.
  • A minority of recent online Humanities reviews warn about AI-flagging disputes and paper volume.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

Good grades are realistic because , and support, but , and participation still require effort.

Online reviews include both easy-A reports and paper-heavy complaints, while as fair if students attend and do the work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students often call the classes easy or manageable because , though English and Humanities writing can be demanding.

Online sections can vary from stress-free to writing-heavy, while but attendance-sensitive.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

66/100

as strictly mandatory, but several comments say participation, logging in, or not missing class matters.

Online evidence stresses logging in and doing work, while lost.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because , and helps motivated students improve.

, but online recommendations are slightly tempered by recent AI-flagging and workload complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and compassion, though some still call her tough but fair.

Format shift

Online grading feels supportive but includes AI-flagging concerns, while as lenient or tough but fair.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload ranges from easy and , and 10-15 hours of homework.

Format shift

Online workload has more reported variation, while but reading and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most reviews praise her as , and confidence-building, with a few serious negative exceptions.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised for feedback and connection, while , and classroom engagement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment is , and written work rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats rely heavily on writing and assignments, with online sections especially emphasizing submissions and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing caring teaching, engaging classes, , and fair support, though some English classes are tough.

Main concern

The main in-person concern is that missing class or falling behind can make writing-heavy courses difficult.

What students said

“She reignited my love for poetry”
ENG24A
“ .”
ENG1A
“Just try not to miss any classes or you will be lost.”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews , and clear directions, but some complain about papers, workload, disorganization, or AI accusations.

Main concern

The main online concern is writing workload and possible AI-use disputes.

What students said

“ Pronto, was understanding and communicative.”
HUMA1
“any work you turn in she flags it as AI, even if you didn't use it.”
HUMA1
“Minimum time spent on homework for me was between 10-15 hours a week.”
ENGL1A4600

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly establish a , and assessment appears mostly assignment-based with occasional easy finals mentioned.

PapersProjectsFinal Is EasyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove broader exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or closed-book exams.

Easy FinalEssaysOnline Posts
“In !”
POETRY1
“Expect to do a good amount of and online posts).”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews mention papers, journals, discussions, and projects but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown .

PapersDiscussion PostsProjects
“ and I think many others would agree that are so unnecessary”
HUMA1
“ ”
HUMA1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and relatable and actually makes you feel valued as a student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Professor Lewitzki organizes what she teaches in the most concise and well-articulated manner for all students to understand very easily.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ if I could!”

📝 Workload Balance

58/100

“Great professor. She requires a lot of reading and a lot of work every week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so encouraging, praising of her students, and unbelievably kind.
  • Gives good lectures, knows how to break down a lesson if you need help
  • Professor Lewitzki, made an online class engaging and fun to learn about humanities.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • Easy class. Not a lot of work and .
  • .
  • If you apply yourself, she will notice and give you as much constructive critique possible in order for you to get an A.

Theme 3

🚩 About Concerns

  • any work you turn in she flags it as AI, even if you didn't use it.
  • and has no respect for the student's time.
  • Not a patient or concerned professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is credible because 33 reviews cover both formats with detailed, mostly consistent praise and a .

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUMA113 reviews
1A3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENG24A2 reviews
POETRY12 reviews
Show 11 more courses
1C1 review
COS1261 review
ENG1C1 review
ENG821 review
ENG841 review
ENGL1A46001 review
ENGL1A61331 review
ENGL24A1 review
ENGL61251 review
ENGL8260541 review
ENGLISH821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 5 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 3