AI Rate Professor

English

Eric Takamine

ENGLISHC1000 · ENGSH1A · ENGLISHONEA · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · ESL52B · ESL53B · 1A · ENGL6040 · ESLAX6685 · ENGA · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable with , and learning independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedTough GraderOff Topic LecturesUnclear Due DatesPolarizing Experience
  • Most recent and many older in-person reviews strongly warn against taking him because of , and .
  • A minority of students say if you attend and participate.
  • The course may not be intellectually impossible, but the grading and communication risk make the student experience poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earned A grades, but repeated reports of , and exact-format penalties make the A costly and unreliable.

The single online review says an A is reachable, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The coursework is often basic reading and essays, but disorganization and the content itself.

Online evidence sounds manageable, while difficult because of unclear teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Several reviews say showing up and participation are important, and one tag says skipping class means you will not pass.

, while the online review only mentions participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because of , and lectures that go off topic.

The single online review recommends him, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many students describe him as picky, unfair, or likely to fail work that does not follow his exact format.

Format shift

Harsh grading evidence is overwhelmingly from in-person reviews, with one online review reporting leniency.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload varies from simple essays and reading to many papers, tests, and homework, but .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide almost all workload evidence, while the lone and essays.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Repeated complaints cite off-topic lectures, confusing directions, poor organization, and little help despite a few positive reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, but and much more numerous.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention essays, reading, presentations, tests, a , and assignments.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe the broadest assessment mix, while online evidence only mentions assignments, essays, participation, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about off-topic , and poor organization.

Main concern

and unfair or .

What students said

“If you do not do an do it, he will automatically fail you.”
EnglishC1000
“Very self directed course, he provides little to no help.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is positive and , and led to an A.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so it may not represent the usual experience.

What students said

“As longest you do the assignments and .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is not consistently described, but and a final exam while and grading.

Tests MentionedFinal Exam MentionedEssaysPresentationUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

TestsFinal ExamEssayPresentation
“He has 3 tests, 1 presentation, 1 essay, and .”
ESL52B
“Basically have 3 tests and .”
ESL52B

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please whatever .”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“He always goes off topic when lecturing and almost never gets to the point.”

⚖️

18/100

“If you do not do an do it, he will automatically fail you.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He always goes off topic when lecturing and almost never gets to the point.
  • Very self directed course, he provides little to no help.
  • and is always there for you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Keep in mind hes a .
  • The whole class is failing because none of us can work up to his standards.
  • you still gotta work for a good grade.
  • Show up, get things done and youll be fine.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • .
  • .
  • I never know when anything is due because he is so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine reviews across many years provide strong pattern evidence, though opinions are polarized and only one review is online.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 520

Course coverage

ENGLISH1A10 reviews
ENG1A8 reviews
ESL53B6 reviews
ESL52B3 reviews
1A2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENGL1A2 reviews
EnglishC10002 reviews
67361 review
ENGA1 review
ENGL60401 review
ENGLISHONEA1 review
ENGSH1A1 review
ESLAX66851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2