AI Rate Professor

Communication

H Wagner

SPCH1 · COMS100 · COM612 · SPEE1 · COMMS100 · SPEECHCOMM · COMS1 · COMM1 · SPECH1 · SCOM5711 · COMMS140 · COMS140 · COM5754 · SPEEC01 · PUBLICSPEAKING · COMST1 · COMS3 · COMMUPS · COMS4 · SPEECH1 · SPEEC1 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable self-teaching and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized communicationUnclear instructionsStory-heavy lecturesStrict gradingEasy content but frustrating class
  • Most recent reviews describe unclear instructions, poor organization, and students teaching themselves.
  • The course content can be easy, but , and communication create frustration.
  • Older reviews are more mixed or positive, but the recent trend is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students call the class easy or earn A grades, but , and tests can make the A unreliable.

Online evidence is too limited and mixed, while but and expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

Public speaking and communication content is often described as manageable, but poor teaching makes it harder than the material itself.

Both formats suggest the material itself is not the main issue; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several in-person reviews say presence, participation, or and points.

; online reviews do not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

The dominant because students report disorganization, vague instructions, and weak teaching.

Online evidence is mixed with one positive review, while and more negative in recent years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students often , and strict speech criteria despite some mentions.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention difficult quizzes and finals.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload ranges from manageable speeches and assignments to many speeches, papers, group projects, and .

Format shift

Online comments mention simple homework but and projects, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Many students say lectures drift into , and communication is weak.

Format shift

Online evidence is limited and mixed, while and clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and exams rather than one single format.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, projects, quizzes, and finals, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized, but recent comments repeatedly cite confusing , and poor communication.

Main concern

and heavy reliance on self-teaching from the book.

What students said

“YOU WILL HAVE TO TEACH YOURSELF OUT OF THE .”
COMS100
“She gives incredibly vague instructions and when you ask her to clarify, she doesn't.”
COMS4

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is mixed, with one strong positive review and , and poor clarity.

Main concern

Online students may need to rely on the textbook and .

What students said

“We had to read the textbook ourselves which wasn't a big deal but and ”
COMS1
“She basically throws the syllabus at you and says " Have fun!"”
COMS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews repeatedly mention vague, difficult, or , but specific proctoring or .

Difficult QuizzesDifficult FinalTest HeavyVague TestsSelf-Taught Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

31/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and textbook-based self-teaching, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policies.

Test HeavyVague TestsSelf-Taught Exams
“35% of your grade is dependent on 3 exams”
COMS100
“ .”
COMMS140

Online

Online reviews mention a difficult quiz and final and no study guide, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Difficult QuizDifficult FinalNo Study Guide
“her quiz and ”
COMS1
“No study guide for test”
COMS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For a communications professor, she is not a good communicator.”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Tells stories instead of teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“Do. Not. Take.”

⚖️

24/100

“Entirely Inflexible. A .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't teach, only tells stories.
  • Her lectures are useless!!
  • She expected us to do all the learning on our own.

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • clarity.
  • She gives incredibly vague instructions and when you ask her to clarify, she doesn't.
  • and .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • YOU WILL HAVE TO TEACH YOURSELF OUT OF THE .
  • .
  • speaches are graded rough but she lets you redo one.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The 48 reviews cover many years and show a .

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 59
3 out of 59
2 out of 58
1 out of 510

Course coverage

SPCH19 reviews
COMS16 reviews
COMS1005 reviews
SPEEC15 reviews
COMM13 reviews
Show 16 more courses
COMMS1403 reviews
COMS1402 reviews
COMS32 reviews
COM57541 review
COM6121 review
COMMS1001 review
COMMUPS1 review
COMS41 review
COMST11 review
PUBLICSPEAKING1 review
SCOM57111 review
SPECH11 review
SPEE11 review
SPEEC011 review
SPEECH11 review
SPEECHCOMM1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values