AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Daniel Sanchez

CHEM20 · CHEM4 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can keep up with a hard chemistry course and use practice worksheets and office hours.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear but demanding chemistryHelpful in office hoursFast-paced lecturesMixed organizationPractice-based exams
  • Students agree chemistry is hard, but several say Sanchez makes it more manageable.
  • Positive , and .
  • Negative and unclear explanations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

An A is possible, but students describe chemistry as hard and say success depends on steady practice and keeping up.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is consistently described as hard, fast-paced chemistry with heavy conceptual load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but comments strongly imply class, Canvas videos, and worksheets matter for success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but older reviews warn about disorganization.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Practice packets are similar to exams and partial credit is mentioned, but some students call him tough or unclear.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students describe a five-unit chemistry class with practice worksheets, Canvas videos, and a fast pace.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

73/100

The , and clear, while the worst reviews call him rushed and disorganized.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews emphasize lectures, worksheets, textbook material, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with strong praise for helpful teaching and .

Main concern

The main risk is falling behind in fast-paced chemistry lectures.

What students said

“The class is fast-paced, but as long as you keep up with the material, you'll do fine.”
Chem20
“ a brief explanation about the topic.”
Chem20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

similar practice work and some partial credit.

Practice Packets Similar to ExamsPartial CreditLecture and Textbook Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and textbook material, with practice packets similar to exams and partial credit.

Practice Packets Similar to ExamsPartial CreditLecture and Textbook Exams
“His practice packets are similar to the exams and he gives partial credit.”
Chem20
“ and textbook.”
Chem20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Chemistry is hard, but he's excited about what he teaches and comes up with analogies that helped me understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, pace, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

73/100

“He is great at teaching, and .”

📈 Difficulty and Grades

43/100

“Chemistry is ”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“ a brief explanation about the topic.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and cares about his students.
  • and I think he made this class as manageable as he could.
  • Does a horrible job at explaining.

Theme 2

📚 About Pace and Work

  • The class is fast-paced, but as long as you keep up with the material, you'll do fine.
  • , and do the practice worksheets.
  • He expects for you to learn a whole chapter every lecture class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

but polarized evidence across two years.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Chem206 reviews
Chem41 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values