AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Victoria Robertson

RC170 · MEDT1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if possible because reviews describe a consistently hostile and unsupported learning experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMean or condescendingNo clear guidanceSelf-teaching requiredNo grace on late workPoor classroom climate
  • Every review is negative or strongly negative, with repeated warnings about rude and humiliating treatment.
  • Students describe unclear , and needing to teach themselves.
  • Online and no positive counterweight.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The course does not sound grade-friendly because students cite unclear grading, no guidance, strict late-work handling, and self-teaching.

Online reviews provide the clearest grading complaints, while and confusing teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The content may not be the only issue, but , and unclear curriculum make the course difficult to navigate.

Both formats describe self-teaching and confusion, with and in-person reviews adding confusing PowerPoint lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , but one online review shows very limited flexibility for late work.

; online evidence only supports strict late-work flexibility, not attendance requirements.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

4/100

Students consistently warn against taking her because they describe mean treatment, poor teaching, and little help.

Online and meaningful format-based positive pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and no grace for slightly late work, with no evidence of .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest grading evidence, while and poor support.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The workload feels heavy because students report random material, no guidance, and having to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention no curriculum and self-teaching, while and poor learning support.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Reviews consistently , and an environment where students are afraid to ask questions.

Format shift

Both online and and harsh treatment.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention grading criteria and late work but do not provide enough clear .

Format shift

Online reviews mention late work and grading criteria, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and an unpleasant classroom environment.

Main concern

The main concern is being treated poorly when asking questions or trying to learn.

What students said

“She made it impossible to learn.”
RC170
“Makes you feel dumb for asking a question or speaking up.”
RC170
“She spends more time doing that than teaching.”
RC170

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online , and a need to teach yourself.

Main concern

The main concern is poor support combined with and harsh treatment.

What students said

“Be prepared to teach yourself and get yelled at.”
RC170
“ ”
RC170
“Victoria gave no grace despite the work I turned in only being 3 hours late!”
MEDT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , open-book status, midterm format, or final format.

No Clear Exam PolicyNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, proctoring, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

No Clear Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, .

No Clear Exam PolicyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to teach yourself and get yelled at.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Only reads off of and .”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

4/100

“ .”

⚖️

10/100

“ ”

❤️ Classroom Climate

8/100

“Makes you feel dumb for asking a question or speaking up.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made it impossible to learn.
  • Only reads off of and .
  • Good luck teaching yourself if .

Theme 2

⚖️ And Support

  • Victoria gave no grace despite the work I turned in only being 3 hours late!
  • she's not going to help you if you're not sure about something.

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Treatment

  • She's a bully and has help from the other bully professors in the RT program.
  • Get's a thrill out of mocking student's who are already .
  • You can't ask her questions because she'll cut you off to make you feel bad.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 7 reviews are available, but they are recent, detailed, and highly consistent across both formats.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

RC1706 reviews
MEDT11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 4