AI Rate Professor

Art

Juliann Wolfgram

102A · AHIS205B · ART101 · ART102A · ART205 · ART205A · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
17.86%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you are highly self-directed, have extra time, and are comfortable with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized courseHeavy readingHidden gradesSlow gradingUnclear exams
  • Most students describe the class as , and frustrating.
  • Grades depend on few high-stakes items, often with and hidden grade visibility.
  • A few students liked her passion and , but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but , and heavy reading that make an A unreliable.

Online reviews show especially poor grade transparency, while and papers.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

The course content is reading-heavy, lecture-heavy, and often because organization and .

Both formats are challenging, with online students stressing workload and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but participation and lecture notes are often needed to survive the class.

In-person reviews mention participation more, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking her because the , and unfair.

Both formats are poorly recommended, with online reviews and hidden grades.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly report , and few high-stakes assessments.

Format shift

Online reviews stress hidden grades and late feedback, while and .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews describe lots of reading, frequent assignments, papers, and work that .

Format shift

Online workload is described as near-daily, while , and papers.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Many students say she is passionate but , and weak at explaining expectations.

Format shift

Online teaching is viewed as especially chaotic, while but remains inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Many , and limited graded items rather than a balanced stream of low-stakes work.

Format shift

Both formats mention few major graded items, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly critical, especially for , and .

Main concern

In-person students often struggle with , and .

What students said

“Never graded or gave back my ”
AHIS205B
“We were graded on 2 exams (midterm & final) and 1 visual analysis paper.”
ART205

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing daily , and weak teaching support.

Main concern

Online students report heavy work with little clarity or feedback.

What students said

“there's something due almost every single day.”
ART205A
“Things from August haven't been graded.”
ART205A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are risky because reviews describe high-stakes , and no clearly student-friendly exam policy overall.

Midterm And FinalResearch PaperVisual Analysis PaperFew High-Stakes GradesUnclear Exam Information

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final exams plus papers, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Midterm And FinalVisual Analysis PaperReading-Based Exams
“We were graded on 2 exams (midterm & final) and 1 visual analysis paper.”
ART205
“ .”
AHIS205B

Online

Online reviews mention exams and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Exams MentionedHidden GradesLate Exam Grading
“ ”
ART102A
“she is the same when she grades the exams.”
ART102A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

20/100

“This professor is easily the least-organized and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“all I did was work on this class every single day (even on weekends sometimes).”

⚖️

18/100

“she also hides your grade all semester so you can't even see what your grade is until she submits it at the end of the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • in a random order
  • she won't teach you how!

Theme 2

📚

  • She gives 2+ assignments a day with LOTS of .
  • really interesting class but its a lot of reading

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Grades are hidden for no reason.
  • Never graded or gave back my

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews across both formats are detailed and strongly , and .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 518

Course coverage

ART1017 reviews
AHIS205B6 reviews
ART102A5 reviews
ART205A4 reviews
102A3 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ART2053 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

2

B 2

C range

5

C 5

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 1