AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Sue Ellen Warren

INFOO11 · FN11 · NUTRITION · NUTR15 · NUT11 · NF110823 · NFOO15 · NANDF15 · NUTRITON11 · NUTR11 · NUTRI1 · NUTR1 · NFOO7734 · NF11 · NFOOD11 · NUTRITION11 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
82.35%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if possible, because the , and grade-friendly with steady participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and patientClear study guidesEasy A with effortLenient gradingPassionate lectures
  • as , and very helpful.
  • Grades are usually easy if students attend, use study guides, and .
  • Online reviews are mixed, with some praise for easy quizzes but and communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very realistic with , and basic reading, though it is not always effortless.

, while online evidence shows easy quizzes but more work and support issues.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

77/100

Most students find the nutrition content clear and fast pacing.

In-person reviews call the class easy and well explained, while online reviews describe tedious but not difficult chapter work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

because lectures, videos, and , but one review says she was very lenient about absences.

In-person reviews mention participation and attendance more often, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

, and helpful, despite weaker online delivery complaints.

, while online recommendations are mixed because of Canvas and email concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

redos, and is often described as generous.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the , while online reviews mention and few major graded items.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

The workload includes quizzes, projects, reading, and a final, but most students say it is manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly homework and several major items, while and useful.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Most students describe her as caring, patient, passionate, and clear in explaining nutrition.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are highly positive, while online .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and study work rather than only exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes, projects, and a categories.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students , and manageable grading.

Main concern

Students may still need to read and attend because quizzes and .

What students said

“Supplies EVERYTHING you need to get an A.”
NUT11
“ .”
NF11

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report easy quiz-heavy work but and .

Main concern

and weak online communication are the main risks.

What students said

“ and I had so many issues with assignments.”
NUTRITION
“ and their questions, so they were also easy to complete.”
NUTR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a standard quiz-and-final structure with study guides and some dropped scores, but .

QuizzesFinal ExamStudy GuidesDropped Lowest Quiz

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

QuizzesFinal ExamStudy GuidesDropped Lowest Quiz
“5 total quizzes (drops lowest quiz score) , 3 easy yet informative projects, 1 final project and 1 final 100 question test.”
NUT11
“She does reviews before the .”
NUTRITION11

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and a , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

QuizzesComprehensive Final ExamMcGrawhill Study Tests
“Comprehensive Final Exam 300 possible points”
NF11
“ and their questions, so they were also easy to complete.”
NUTR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Supplies EVERYTHING you need to get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“If you're looking for an easy A in Nutrition, take her class!!!”

⚖️

90/100

“if you .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Warren is awesome! She cares about her students and listens to all questions and concerns.
  • and I liked the way of her teaching
  • She is so sweet and understanding.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Class isn't difficult.
  • .
  • Got an A but worked very hard.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • and I had so many issues with assignments.
  • Professor Warren is easy to get in touch with and quick to offer help.
  • Dont get me wrong, professor Warren is sweet, rarely checks her emails.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 41 reviews span many years and show a consistent in-person pattern, though online evidence is limited.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NF117 reviews
NUTRITION6 reviews
NUTR114 reviews
NUT113 reviews
NUTRITION113 reviews
Show 12 more courses
FN112 reviews
NANDF152 reviews
NFOO77342 reviews
NFOOD112 reviews
NUTR12 reviews
NUTRITON112 reviews
96261 review
INFOO111 review
NF1108231 review
NFOO151 review
NUTR151 review
NUTRI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1