AI Rate Professor

Languages

Hailiang Zhao

CHIN1 · CHIN2 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if and fast-paced language practice without needing much support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing experienceHeavy homeworkFast vocabulary paceEasy tests for someMixed teaching quality
  • Reviews are sharply split between students calling Zhao great and others describing poor communication or teaching.
  • online and in-person formats.
  • Students with prior Chinese knowledge or strong self-discipline seem to do much better.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earned A grades and , but and fast vocabulary pace make the A effort-dependent.

Online reviews mention easy tests but , while and homework are needed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Chinese 1 may be manageable, but Chinese 2 and fast vocabulary growth make the content harder for beginners.

Online reviews stress fast pacing, while in-person reviews show both a hard Chinese 2 and a manageable Chinese 1 experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews , but participation, speaking, and class meetings matter for success.

Online reviews mention class meetings and Canvas contact, while and speaking.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on student background because reviews alternate between excellent support and serious teaching complaints.

Both formats are polarized, with online complaints focused on pace and communication and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

63/100

Grades can be high and tests can be easy, but homework and few graded items can hurt students who fall behind.

Format shift

but homework-heavy, while in-person grades look attainable with participation and homework.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

.

Format shift

Both formats mention a lot of warnings.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching feedback is polarized, with several excellent reviews offset by severe complaints about communication and instruction.

Format shift

Online reviews split between great lectures and rude or uncommunicative behavior, while professor.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and speaking, so assessment appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests, quizzes, and homework, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

teaching complaints to strong beginner-friendly praise.

Main concern

Teaching quality appears inconsistent depending on section and student fit.

What students said

“This teacher was terrible!”
CHIN1
“you'll be fine as long as you participate and do the homework.”
CHIN1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly mixed, with praise for easy tests and lectures but , and communication.

Main concern

The class can move fast and require a lot of .

What students said

“Expects you to learn a lot of vocab in a short amount of time.”
CHIN2
“The test and .”
CHIN1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but suggests tests and of proctoring or open-book rules.

Easy TestsEasy QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews mention tests and quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Easy TestsEasy QuizzesTest Heavy
“The test and .”
CHIN1
“Test heavy”
CHIN2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The teacher isn't great. lot of homework but need to stay on top of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting , and grade conditions. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Uncommunicative, Rude, and very immature.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ ”

📈 Grade Path

68/100

“you'll be fine as long as you participate and do the homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The professor is great.
  • This teacher was terrible!
  • She was a great first professor and !

Theme 2

📚 And Pace

  • lot of homework but need to stay on top of the .
  • Expects you to learn a lot of vocab in a short amount of time.
  • A lot more vocab is introduced so .

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests And Grades

  • The test and .
  • Tests heavy
  • you'll be fine as long as you participate and do the homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has only 7 reviews and strong disagreement, but comments , and teaching quality.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHIN14 reviews
CHIN23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values