AI Rate Professor

English

Rose Ann Cerofeci

ENGLISH82 · ENG1A · ENG0000 · ENG6059 · ENGLISH84 · ENGLISH1A · ENG82 · ENGLI82 · ENGLSIH84 · ENGLI6112 · ENLGISH1A · ENGL84 · ENGLI84 · ENG6104 · ENG6056 · ENG1C · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
88.46%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take Cerofeci if you want a , but expect and writing effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorStrong feedbackWriting improvementTough but fairReading and essays
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and motivating.
  • Her classes are not always effortless because essays, reading, and .
  • In person reviews are especially enthusiastic, while online reviews are positive but mention heavier workload more often.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Good grades are very achievable if students keep up, revise, participate, and , but essays and A.

In person evidence includes more easy-A comments, while online evidence and essays.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course feels approachable because and supports beginners, but English writing and .

In person students often call the class straightforward, while online students describe the same support with more workload pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation and class presence matter, and one review mentions a phone policy, but the reviews do not prove a .

In person evidence emphasizes participation and classroom routines, while online evidence mentions quick Zoom classes and assignment support.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and improves their writing.

, but in person reviews are broader and more consistently enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

She is supportive with feedback and makeups, but many students describe her as a .

Format shift

In , while online reviews mention fewer extra-credit options and .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload is manageable for organized students but , and .

Format shift

Online reviews sound heavier because compressed sessions and , while in person work is often described as steady but manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Her teaching is consistently praised as , and effective for building writing confidence.

Format shift

In person reviews provide the strongest evidence, while online and communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear centered on essays, writing assignments, journals, group work, reading, and .

Format shift

Both formats focus mainly on writing assignments, with in person reviews adding more participation and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing , and major growth in writing.

Main concern

Some in and the class participation-heavy.

What students said

“ and a lot of easy group work.”
ENG1C
“She is a and pushes you but because of that I have improved as a writer.”
ENGLISH1A
“ ”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews , and responsiveness, though some students warn about heavy work.

Main concern

Online students , and .

What students said

“We had four essays due over the session but she does a great job with feedback and !”
ENG1A
“We do have a lot of homework though so dont procrastinate and also she doesnt give so good luck!”
ENGLISH1A
“not the but a lot of work save yourself the stress!”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mainly writing-based with occasional tests or vocab quizzes.

EssaysWriting AssignmentsVocab TestsEasy Tests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention easy tests, vocab tests, essays, and a final essay, but .

Four PapersVocab TestsFinal EssayEasy Tests Mentioned
“ and their readings in class.”
ENG1C
“ . Easy tests.”
ENGLISH84
“ ! !”
ENGLSIH84

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam ; they mainly mention essays and homework.

EssaysHomeworkNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“We had four essays due over the session but she does a great job with feedback and !”
ENG1A
“We do have a lot of homework though so dont procrastinate and also she doesnt give so good luck!”
ENGLISH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Professor C had a massive impact on me, including my English.”

❤️ Student Support

94/100

“She truly makes the classroom and lectures inclusive.”

⚖️

62/100

“She is a and pushes you but because of that I have improved as a writer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She has a lot of experience in English and has great stories.
  • She is enthusiastic and teaches clearly.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • and answered all of the questions I had.
  • She'll even revise your essay before you turn it in if .
  • She works with yu whenever yu need help.

Theme 3

📚 About Work And Grades

  • and a lot of easy group work.
  • She is a , but I guarantee that you will leave the class a better writer.
  • Just keep up with the work and you'll be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

97/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews span 2009 to 2024 with strong consistency, rich detail, and both online and in person evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGLISH1A12 reviews
ENG8210 reviews
ENG1A6 reviews
ENG1C4 reviews
ENGLISH824 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENGLISH843 reviews
ENGL842 reviews
ENG00001 review
ENG60561 review
ENG60591 review
ENG61041 review
ENGLI61121 review
ENGLI821 review
ENGLI841 review
ENGLSIH841 review
ENLGISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 12

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2