AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Luca Struble

PHIL1O1 · PHIL111 · PHIL112 · PHIL106 · PHIL6 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with reading, problems, or discussion.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful FeedbackClear ExpectationsChallenging PhilosophyAccessible ProfessorDiscussion and Reading
  • Students describe Struble as , and strong at explaining difficult philosophy or logic material.
  • The classes can be intellectually challenging, especially logic and reading-heavy philosophy sections.
  • Grades are usually fair and attainable when students complete the work, participate, and ask questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is attainable with completed work, participation, and attention, but the material itself is not effortless.

Online reviews include one clear easy-A comment, while but and quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Philosophy and logic are repeatedly described as hard, even though Struble makes the material easier to understand.

Online logic reviews highlight math-like problems, while and quiz difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

as strictly mandatory, but , and paying attention are important for points and learning.

, while in-person reviews emphasize participation and lecture attention.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him because , and effective with difficult material.

Online reviews are more consistently enthusiastic, while but include lecture and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Grading appears fair and and , but quizzes and hard material prevent a truly easy label.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize clear criteria and success through work, while and papers despite difficult quizzes.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is moderate to heavy because , and weekly problems.

Format shift

Online logic sections focus on weekly problems and discussion, while and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe him as , and helpful at clarifying hard concepts.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are especially strong, while but are less unanimous on lecture delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessments include discussions, , and papers, making the course balanced overall.

Format shift

Online sections lean toward assignments and discussions, while , and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews praise his knowledge and fairness but , and a less polished lecture style.

Main concern

Students may need to ask questions and keep up with .

What students said

“you're allowed a sheet of notes for but if you pay attention in lecture you won't need it.”
PHIL112
“Really smart guy, not the .”
PHIL111

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly , and clear help with difficult material.

Main concern

Online sections , and comfort with hard concepts.

What students said

“ of readings, walks you through hw examples and actually will be there to help.”
PHIL106
“The class is hard, but the teacher is great.”
PHIL6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but student-friendly overall because and no review proves strict proctoring.

Note Sheet AllowedReading QuizzesPop QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and an allowed sheet of notes, making the exam setup partly student-friendly but not effortless.

Note Sheet AllowedReading QuizzesTests And Paper
“you're allowed a sheet of notes for ”
PHIL112
“ ”
PHIL111

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and assignments but do not clearly .

Pop QuizzesDiscussion PointsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Many group discussions, replying to students is required for points.”
PHIL1O1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is hard, but the teacher is great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“he is a great professor and very knowledgeable! .”

📚 Difficulty Balance

48/100

“Let me start off with PHILOSOPHY IS HARD.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • The lectures were great and he provided great supplemental learning tools.
  • He does his best to break down the problems for you.

Theme 2

📈 About Work and Grades

  • an easy A if you do all your work.
  • The work itself is also not tremendously hard, you're allowed a sheet of notes for
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • he truly cares about your success, he wants you to pass his class
  • help.
  • He will also help you individually if you are having trouble with something.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 9 reviews are detailed and mostly consistent, but the sample size is limited and split across formats and courses.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1064 reviews
PHIL1O12 reviews
PHIL1111 review
PHIL1121 review
PHIL61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1