AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Juan Ortiz

MATH73 · MATH1700320 · MATH370234 · MATH170 · MATH165 · MATH37 · MATH80 · MAT73 · MATH120 · MATH150 · MATH130 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
56.52%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can tolerate packet-heavy lectures, do the homework independently, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkMixed Teaching QualityLenient Partial CreditPacket-Based LecturesAttendance Matters
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with older lower-level math students often praising him and newer .
  • Grades can be helped by lenient partial credit and , but homework packets are a major workload complaint.
  • Students who can self-study from packets may do fine, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades can be attainable because he gives partial credit and , but and weak teaching can make the A costly.

credit, while online reviews are too mixed to call it easy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is sometimes basic or packet-based, but pace, unclear explanations, and .

and nightmare pacing, while in-person reviews vary by course level and year.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Several reviews say attendance or Zoom meetings matter, but and .

Online evidence includes required Zoom meetings, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Recommendation depends heavily on course level and learning style because and serious teaching complaints.

Online reviews are divided, while but with more evidence from packet-heavy classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Many reviews say he gives credit for work shown, accepts late homework, or grades easily, even when teaching complaints are strong.

Format shift

In-person reviews strongly support lenient partial credit, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Homework and packets are repeatedly described as excessive, overwhelming, or constant across many math sections.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, with online reviews adding daily Zoom and packet overload concerns.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students praising clear help and others saying he barely explains, lectures boringly, or requires self-teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews are split, while positive lower-level classes and newer negative higher-level classes.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, exams, tests, practice tests, and to performance.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests tied to classwork and homework, while and exams come from packets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews praise his humor and but often criticize boring packet lectures and .

Main concern

Students may need tutoring or self-study because .

What students said

“ and barely teaches.”
MATH150
“He has a good sense of humor and will go easy on you.”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, ranging from step-by-step clarity to a nightmare workload with required Zoom meetings.

Main concern

Online sections may require daily meetings, heavy packets, and self-motivation.

What students said

“ and properly clarifies questions.”
MATH1700320
“It was a nightmare. Gives way too much packets expect you to show up everyday for zoom meetings.”
MATH170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually packet-aligned and may allow partial credit, but one review flags an and no review proves open-book or strict proctoring.

Tests From PacketsPartial CreditQuizzesTimed Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and include partial credit, but one student reports an unexpectedly timed final.

Tests From PacketsPartial CreditTimed Final MentionedPractice Tests
“ .”
MATH150
“He also didnt bother to tell anyone the , so i failed it.”
MATH150

Online

Online reviews mention tests related to classwork and homework, but they do not clearly .

Tests Related To HomeworkQuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and homework.”
MATH1700320
“Even thought the .”
MATH170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Only good thing is he's a you get wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“He is less than average when it comes to teaching.”

⚖️

75/100

“Even if you get a question wrong, you get credit for doing the equation in general.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“there .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He goes through multiple lessons and reads off packets .
  • Prof. Ortiz teaches the material really well and he's super chill
  • Lectures are boring, but thats math for you.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Exams

  • and .
  • .
  • as long as you do the practice test.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Gives way too much packets expect you to show up everyday for zoom meetings.
  • Whenever we are done with a .
  • You have to be self motivated to get the work done since most of it is done online.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 28 reviews span many years and include detailed, , and teaching inconsistency.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH378 reviews
MATH1506 reviews
MATH1703 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH3702342 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH802 reviews
MAT731 review
MATH1301 review
MATH1651 review
MATH17003201 review
MATH731 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2