AI Rate Professor

Industrial Technology

Henry Der-Antonian

ACR6 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing InstructionInconsistent GradingCanvas IssuesTough Grader
  • The only review describes the class as hard to understand and .
  • The student , and incorrect quiz answers.
  • Evidence is very limited, so the rating is low-confidence but strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The student earned an A- but , and deductions that make the grade feel costly.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not clearly described as extremely hard, but the instruction and .

Only online evidence exists, and it focuses on organization rather than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The only student voice is strongly negative because the professor is hard to understand and inconsistent in grading.

All recommendation evidence is from one online review, with no in-person comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

The , and includes deductions despite unclear expectations.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The but does not prove an unusually heavy workload.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The student says he is , and does not use Canvas correctly.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, with no in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The review mentions quizzes and and assignments matter.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, with no in-person assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports , and confusing feedback.

Main concern

The and grading that the student says does not make sense.

What students said

“Incredibly hard to understand.”
ACR6
“ and will dock you for .”
ACR6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review mentions quizzes with wrong answers but does .

Online QuizzesWrong Answers Reported

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence mentions quizzes with incorrect , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, or open-book rules.

Online QuizzesWrong Answers Reported
“ and will mark you wrong even tho you got the question correct.”
ACR6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and will dock you for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Low.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Clarity

20/100

“Incredibly hard to understand.”

⚖️

18/100

“Is not consistent with and .”

🧪 Quiz Issues

40/100

“ and will mark you wrong even tho you got the question correct.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Incredibly hard to understand.
  • Will .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Is not consistent with and .
  • and will dock you for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the evidence is detailed but too limited for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACR61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values