AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Ruby Marquez

SLAN112 · ASL112 · SLAN111 · ASL2 · SLAN131 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her only if you can tolerate disorganization and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but unorganizedHomework heavyParticipation mattersTextbook dependentUnclear grading
  • Students often describe her as caring and .
  • Many , and syllabus mismatches.
  • Homework, textbook use, participation, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Good grades are possible, but students must keep up with , and .

The online review reports fast pacing, while but heavy and organization is inconsistent.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, but fast pacing, book dependence, and disorganization make the course feel harder.

Online evidence suggests more self-teaching, while and stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as important, and multiple reviews say skipping class hurts performance.

, while the single online review focuses on participation and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend her when they value patience and kindness, but because of and organization.

The online review is negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some flexibility appears possible, but and syllabus mismatches make the .

Format shift

, while the online review says the student never knew the grade until the end.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and participation demands.

Format shift

Both online and also noting fast unit pacing.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her caring attitude helps, but disorganization, weak communication, and .

Format shift

Online teaching is described as limited and book-based, while but inconsistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment combines , and video assignments.

Format shift

In-person reviews give detailed assessment evidence, while the , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

while repeatedly criticizing organization, workload, and grading clarity.

Main concern

Students may not know grades or .

What students said

“ . Refuses to use technology and you will never know your grade.”
ASL2
“LOTS of HW but pretty simple.”
SLAN112

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes limited communication, fast pacing, and heavy reliance on the book.

Main concern

Online instruction had weak communication and fast pacing.

What students said

“There was very limited communication and the teachings are directly from the book so a must have.”
SLAN111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Pop QuizzesMultiple TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and strict attendance, but do not clearly prove the exact exam format or proctoring policy.

Multiple TestsPop Quizzes
“2 deaf events, 1 video assignment, 5 tests, 1 interview.”
ASL112
“Skip class? You won't pass.”
SLAN112

Online

The online review mentions pop quizzes but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Pop Quizzes
“Beware of pop quizzes”
SLAN111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very friendly and sweet but enter at your own risk, you've been warned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Ms. Kikki is an excellent teacher for beginner's ASL.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Over all great Prof. LOTS of HW but pretty simple.”

⚖️

45/100

“The syllabus does not match what she grades you in in the end.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is great Professor and very patient and care too.
  • She has a heart of gold that wins you over.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • LOTS of HW but pretty simple.
  • .
  • I never knew my grade until the end

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • .
  • .
  • . Refuses to use technology and you will never know your grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

79/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews over several years provide consistent , and organization issues.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASL1123 reviews
SLAN1113 reviews
SLAN1122 reviews
ASL21 review
SLAN1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1