AI Rate Professor

English

Stephen Peluso

ENG1A · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
15.79%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding writing challenge and can tolerate a high-workload, high-risk class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTough graderStrong avoid warningsUnclear expectationsOccasional fair feedback
  • Most because of , and unclear expectations.
  • A few students , and can improve writing.
  • The course may reward disciplined writers, but the dominant student experience is stressful and negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earn A or B grades, but comments repeatedly say the course takes heavy effort and is risky for imperfect writers.

Online reviews include both one fair-grading report and strong avoid warnings, while and random penalties.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The writing content may be basic English, but workload, , and unclear expectations make the course feel hard.

Both formats describe heavy work, with in-person reviews showing stronger complaints about classroom pressure and grading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several comments mention showing up, participation, and attendance as important for survival in the class.

Attendance and participation evidence appears in both formats, but the and online participation comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students explicitly warn others away because the , and classroom experience feel punishing.

, but the in-person reviews are especially concentrated and severe.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Most comments call him a tough or harsh grader, though a .

Format shift

, while in-person feedback is mostly harsh and includes random zeros and late-work disputes.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly describe lots of , and a time-consuming workload.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both online and in-person reviews, with in-person comments more consistently negative.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

The dominant feedback describes disrespect, confusion, discomfort, and feedback and learning.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed but mostly negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Reviews focus on writing assignments, essays, papers, MLA, vocab, and .

Format shift

Both formats point strongly to assignment-heavy assessment, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, , and unclear assignment expectations.

Main concern

Students report , and uncomfortable classroom interactions.

What students said

“ !!! TERRIBLE PROFESSOR!! Assigns so much work.”
ENG1A
“Please don't believe this guy when he says he accepts late work. And he gives out random zeros.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative about workload and difficulty, though two students found value in .

Main concern

Online students repeatedly warn that the class is time consuming and not an easy A.

What students said

“DO.NOT.TAKE.THIS.CLASS.”
ENG1A
“If your looking for an easy A, then stay away.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and instead focus on essays, writing assignments, homework, and grading.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyEssay-based assessmentAssignment-heavy course

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mostly describe essays, papers, homework, and .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyEssay-based assessmentWriting-heavy course
“Attend class, expect a lot of .”
ENG1A
“Assigns so much work.”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyAssignment-heavy course
“It's a very time consuming class with many assignments.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your looking for an easy A, then stay away.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“DO.NOT.TAKE.THIS.CLASS.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“It's a very time consuming class with many assignments.”

⚖️

20/100

“Either you are a perfect writer, or you will fail.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Either you are a perfect writer, or you will fail.
  • Attend class, expect a lot of .
  • He assigns a lot of , but it is easy.

Theme 2

🚫 About Student Warnings

  • DO.NOT.TAKE.THIS.CLASS.
  • Stay away.
  • run for life or switch out
  • .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Experience

  • Great teacher! Cares about his students success.
  • He tries to make you feel dumb when you ask questions.
  • Gives way more work then expected and hard to keep up in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 19 recent reviews across both formats show repeated, , and recommendation risk.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENG1A19 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1