AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Dean Lofgren

CHCHCHCH · HEALT1 · CHCHCH · CONTHEALTH1 · CONTHEALTH1H · CH8016 · HEALTH1 · CH1 · CONTHEALTH · PE270 · CHEALTH1 · HEALTH · 101 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
96.43%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and a supportive professor.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear feedbackVery easy ACaring and upbeatOrganized course structureLow-stress grading
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Lofgren as , and easy to follow.
  • Both online and in-person sections are low stress, with many students earning A grades through steady completion.
  • The course is easy without feeling empty, because students still report learning useful health material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Getting an A is very easy because , and many students report high grades with modest effort.

Online evidence is even stronger for easy A claims, while and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

91/100

The health content is described as , and easy to understand.

Online sections are structured and simple, while and worksheets.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, but other reviews warn that skipping can hurt because notes and participation matter.

Online flexibility comes from weekly deadlines, while because .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and still helps them learn useful material.

Both formats are highly recommended, with online reviews emphasizing convenience and in-person reviews emphasizing enthusiasm.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

Students repeatedly call him an easy grader who , and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize full credit and easy pass conditions, while and .

Workload

Light

86/100

Work is regular but simple, with online weekly tasks and .

Format shift

Online has steady weekly work, while several reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and genuinely enjoyable to learn from.

Format shift

Online reviews praise feedback and structure, while , and personality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to come from weekly assignments, discussions, quizzes, tests, papers, and participation .

Format shift

Online sections use weekly assignments and tests, while , and simple papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an engaging, upbeat lecture course with , and .

Main concern

Some students mention lecture tangents or the need to attend for notes.

What students said

“Lofgren is a great professor! He's not a , but you will absolutely learn in this class.”
CH1
“ .”
HEALTH
“ ; No final or hw except 2 simple papers.”
CH1

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe a simple, structured course with , and .

Main concern

Students still need to keep up with weekly deadlines and participation.

What students said

“I ended the course with a 99% and hardly put forth effort.”
HEALTH1
“Super easy online course.”
CH1
“There are multiple assignments due each week along with a test, but lot like a bad midterm, etc.”
CH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and tests are described as easy or based on homework, lectures, notes, and weekly online material, but reviews .

Weekly Online TestsLecture-Based TestsFinal Exam MentionedSimple Assessments

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy and based on lecture notes, homework, or worksheets, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Lecture-Based TestsWorksheet-Based TestsNo Final Mentioned In One Review
“ and lectures.”
CH1
“ .”
HEALTH
“For the and you will be fine.”
CH1

Online

, and a final exam, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly TestsQuizzesFinal Exam MentionedResearch-Based Knowledge
“The quizzes and from researching.”
CH1
“ paragraph about a video, and post in a .”
CH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super easy online course. paragraph about a video, and post in a discussion every week, plus a . I forgot about 2 weeks worth of work and still ended up with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Lofgren is a great professor! He's not a , but you will absolutely learn in this class.”

📈 Easy A Value

96/100

“I ended the course with a 99% and hardly put forth effort.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“BY FAR THE BEST PROFESSOR at El Camino College!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good instructor. Motivating, enthusiastic, and straight forward teaching style.
  • and he always came to class with a positive and uplifting attitude.
  • People who are not interested in this subject will still have fun listening to his lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • He is extremely fair and it is actually more difficult NOT to do well in this class.
  • Easy A if you put in average effort!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Very easy and convenient online course.
  • The material is made very easy to understand by this professor and keeping up online was not too difficult.
  • Took Lofgren's online course. I liked the format where everything was very well structured and no surprises.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

101

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years , and detailed grading comments.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 588
4 out of 512
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CH133 reviews
CONTHEALTH13 reviews
CH80162 reviews
CHCHCH2 reviews
HEALTH12 reviews
Show 7 more courses
PE2702 reviews
CHCHCHCH1 review
CHEALTH11 review
CONTHEALTH1 review
CONTHEALTH1H1 review
HEALT11 review
HEALTH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 5 · A 26

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1