AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kimberly Davis

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

, unless you are prepared to handle confusion and limited support on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpful supportStressful communicationConfusing courseTough gradingHeavy homework
  • The only review is strongly negative and says the professor adds stress instead of helping.
  • The student describes the course as confusing and says questions are answered with attitude.
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

There is no evidence of an easy A, and the , and stress.

All evidence comes from one online review, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The course is described as confusing, and the professor is said to provide poor support when students need help.

Only online evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The , so flexibility is not clearly proven.

The only evidence is online, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student directly because the professor is unhelpful and stressful.

All recommendation evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

The and , but the single review gives limited detail.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and there is .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The review includes a lots of and describes the class as stressful.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists, with no in-person comparison.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only review says the professor does not help and and sassy remarks.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists, and there are no in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not describe specific assessments, so the .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes a confusing and stressful class with unhelpful communication.

Main concern

The main concern is lack of supportive help when students ask questions.

What students said

“She answers questions with attitude and sassy remarks.”
133439
“the class can be a ”
133439

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ be a but I highly suggest taking this course with a professor that actually helps you instead of giving you attitude and stress for no reason as you are already stressed enough with this course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“She answers questions with attitude and sassy remarks.”

📚 Workload Stress

20/100

“you are already stressed enough with this course”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • I highly suggest taking this course with a professor that actually helps you instead of giving you attitude and stress for no reason.
  • She answers questions with attitude and sassy remarks.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • the class can be a
  • you are already stressed enough with this course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though that review is recent and detailed enough to identify major concerns.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

1334391 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1