AI Rate Professor

Earth Science

Ziad Sedki

OCEAN10 · OCEA10 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
21.43%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you are highly interested in the subject and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized CanvasHeavy labsUnclear instructionsSlow communicationDifficult exams
  • Most students describe the course as , and too demanding for an intro class.
  • Labs and itself is not always hard.
  • A few students earned good grades with steady effort, but the if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but students say it , and managing unclear course structure.

Online reviews include some A outcomes with effort, while and sparse to suggest an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course is supposed to be introductory, but students say the , and organization make it feel much harder.

Both formats describe an intro course that feels harder than expected, especially because of disorganization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , though videos, labs, and group work require steady participation.

Online reviews focus on modules and lecture videos, while and group work without a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

21/100

because the course feels disorganized, unclear, and poorly supported.

Online and a few online students offering conditional praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Labs are sometimes described as lenient, but exams and overall expectations are often seen as strict or difficult.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly contrast lenient labs with stricter exams, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly , and excessive time demands.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize heavy modules and labs, while three hours.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments describe unclear lectures, poor explanations, weak responsiveness, and disorganized course management.

Format shift

and emails, while in-person reviews add sarcastic answers and missed classes.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams, with exams creating much of the difficulty.

Format shift

Online reviews mention labs, assignments, quizzes, and exams, while and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also negative, describing very time-consuming labs, poor organization, weak communication, and missing class.

Main concern

In-person students report disorganization and poor responsiveness.

What students said

“Nothing is hard just very time consuming.”
OCEA10
“run away if u can.”
OCEA10

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing disorganized modules, unclear , and difficult tests.

Main concern

Online students struggle with , and limited instructor support.

What students said

“The , and many assignments seem designed for in-person completion rather than online”
OCEA10
“Lectures were incredibly difficult to follow. .”
OCEA10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show difficult exams and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, take-home, or closed-book rules.

Difficult examsStudy guide exams in one reviewOnline quizzesStrict exam grading

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final structure.

Online

Online reviews mention difficult exams, quizzes, and one report that exams came from study guides and online quizzes, but .

Difficult examsExams from study guideOnline quizzesStrict exam grading
“ but .”
OCEA10
“ and online quizzes”
OCEAN10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and this feels far from an introduction class. run away if u can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Lectures were incredibly difficult to follow. .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“There has been one lab due each day since this course started and ”

👍 Recommendation Level

21/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Support

  • When students asked questions, we were usually told to look it up ourselves.
  • Office and .
  • if you have questions

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • The
  • The and it makes it hard to know what to do and when something is due.
  • .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • The because students had to learn many concepts on their own.
  • The workload feels excessive.
  • but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The 14 reviews are recent, detailed, format-labeled, and strongly consistent about disorganization, workload, and weak support.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

OCEA1012 reviews
15661 review
OCEAN101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1