AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Patsy Tebbs

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless the class is unavoidable and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing deliveryTough gradingCondescending toneTechnology issuesNot recommended
  • Students describe the teaching as , and often condescending.
  • as very strict, with risk around electronic submissions and exact directions.
  • All , and the recommendation tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even one A appears tied to navigating strict directions and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course feels harder because students say material is barely covered and .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Participation matters appears repeatedly, suggesting attendance or in-class engagement is important.

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students repeatedly say they would not recommend the professor because of and .

The recommendation and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students explicitly call her a and warn that small submission issues can lead to no credit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Workload is not the main complaint, but and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload and assignments.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe confusing delivery, tangents, little material coverage, and a condescending classroom tone.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on homework, participation, and assignment submission rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students consistently , and poor support.

Main concern

Students may struggle with and .

What students said

“Her delivery method is confusing and comes off and will make you feel incompetent instead of supporting and encouraging”
9090
“HMWK is submitted via email but struggles with technology, goes on tangents, acceptable ”
9090
“She barely covers any material in class and expects you to already know what she knows and ends up going on tangents a lot.”
9090

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She barely covers any material in class and expects you to already know what she knows and ends up going on tangents a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Her delivery method is confusing and comes off and will make you feel incompetent instead of supporting and encouraging”

⚖️

8/100

“ and will make you feel incompetent instead of supporting and encouraging”

👎 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“0/10 would not recommend.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and comes off very condescending
  • She barely covers any material in class and expects you to already know what she knows
  • goes on tangents

Theme 2

⚖️

  • make sure to follow her exact directions or else you may end up not getting any credit for it at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent reviews are detailed and highly consistent, but all are for one course and one format.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

90904 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values