AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

E. Morales

MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH191 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can handle a and are ready to study beyond the homework.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingTough ExamsStrict GradingHelpful When EngagedMath Heavy
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him inspirational and students who describe the course as terrible.
  • The main risk is hard exams that some students .
  • Students who ask questions, study seriously, and use his notes or videos report better outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show that getting one requires serious studying and .

The online review says exams were unfairly mismatched, while studying to withdrawal or low grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content is described as difficult, fast, and and .

Both online and reviews adding that the course can work for students who seek help.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not give .

Neither the online nor in-person reviews clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on fit because students either praise his support or and exams.

The online , while in-person reviews are split between strong praise and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and extra deductions for solving problems differently.

Format shift

The online review and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Homework can be plentiful, and the .

Format shift

Online workload detail is limited to exams, while and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with strong praise for care and support balanced by complaints about speed, poor alignment, and little review.

Format shift

The online review is strongly negative, while and severe criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Grades appear and few graded items, with homework having limited impact in at least one class.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams as the main problem, and and plentiful homework with low grade impact.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

him excellent and others warning against taking him.

Main concern

, and uneven alignment between teaching and assessments.

What students said

“ .”
MATH191
“The course is pretty difficult but if you ask questions go over the tests, and study well, you will easily get an A.”
MATH191
“ , but the .”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative, citing mismatched exams and .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH191

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as hard, high-impact, and poorly matched to homework, but reviews .

Hard ExamsTest HeavyGraded By Few ThingsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded items, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Hard ExamsTest HeavyGraded By Few Things
“ , but the .”
MATH80
“ .”
MATH191

Online

The online review says exams did not match homework and deductions were strict, but it .

Hard ExamsStrict Grading
“ .”
MATH191
“He also deducts 10 points off exams if you solve problems a different way from him.”
MATH191

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The course is pretty difficult but if you ask questions go over the tests, and study well, you will easily get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized teaching experiences; credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

28/100

“If you solve problems a slightly different way from him, he deducts an extra 10 points.”

🧪

25/100

“ , but the .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He's super inspirational and wants his students to succeed.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Exams

  • .
  • .
  • , but the .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Morales was great professor imo.
  • Professor Morales is awesome.
  • Moves too fast, gets off topic, and does pretty much no review.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • if you ask questions go over the tests, and study well, you will easily get an A.
  • if you want a .
  • and is plentiful but barely affects your grades.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 8 reviews provide detailed but sharply conflicting experiences across courses and years.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1913 reviews
MATH803 reviews
MATH1702 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1