AI Rate Professor

English

Susan Herdzina

ENGL6506 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · 1C000 · ENGLISH1C · ENG6308 · ENGLI1C · 1A · ENGL1C · ENG6504 · ENGL1 · ENG27 · ENG1C · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if , and self-directed essay work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy papersUnclear expectationsExtra creditPolarizing teaching
  • Reviews are highly polarized, but recent and detailed comments , and slow communication.
  • The workload is paper-heavy and reading-heavy, with several students calling it overwhelming or busy work.
  • Some students , and helpful if you already write well and stay engaged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible with and effort, but , and unclear expectations.

Online evidence is limited but negative on workload, while and many harsh workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course feels difficult because writing topics, readings, papers, and .

Online reviews emphasize politics-heavy essays, while , and unclear grading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews describe sign-in sheets, participation pressure, and warnings that skipping class hurts performance.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, while online reviews do not establish a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking her because of , and inconsistent support.

Online reviews are limited and mostly critical, while but still strongly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

27/100

Students , and grades that feel hard to predict.

Format shift

Online and essays, with more detail in in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly describe lots of , and last-minute assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews describe compressed weekly work and big essays, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Although some students find her caring and explanations.

Format shift

Online reviews are limited and critical on organization, while and unclear experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Comments center , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split, but many criticize , and mandatory attendance signals.

Main concern

Students often struggle with , and paper-heavy work.

What students said

“She lacks organization.”
ENG1C
“ and isn't helpful.”
ENGL1C
“She keeps a sign in sheet so get to class.”
1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews report heavy essays, politics-focused writing, poor communication, and one note of .

Main concern

Online students may , and heavy writing deadlines.

What students said

“she will post the entire week's work on Friday, expected to be done by Sunday.”
1C000
“the class is nothing but politics & can be extremely difficult to write the ”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and essays, and they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Essay-Heavy AssessmentFinal EssayNo Clear Exam Policy Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group projects but do not clearly prove standard exam rules or proctoring policies.

Multiple EssaysResearch PaperGroup Project
“she has about 5 essays to turn in including a research”
ENGLI1C
“ if u ask me.”
ENG1C

Online

Online reviews mention major essays and a final essay but do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Major EssaysFinal EssayNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“extremely difficult to write the ”
ENGL1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So unorganized and unhelpful. I love English but this class was difficult for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ and isn't helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

📝 Workload Pressure

18/100

“She gives a TON of homework but without a lot of support.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She never follows her class plan
  • and .
  • She's a good teacher. but easy to talk to.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Papers

  • Expect HW and a lot of reading and .
  • she has about 5 essays to turn in including a research
  • and overwhelming.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades and Support

  • Gives a lot of opportunities for .
  • Harsh grades with no basis.
  • and you'll pass easily.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 36 reviews span many years and include detailed, recurring patterns despite polarized opinions.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENG1C9 reviews
ENG1A6 reviews
ENGL1A5 reviews
ENGLISH1C4 reviews
1C0002 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENGL1C2 reviews
ENGLI1C2 reviews
1A1 review
ENG271 review
ENG63081 review
ENG65041 review
ENGL11 review
ENGL65061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values