AI Rate Professor

Art History

Walter Meyer

102A · ART103 · ART101 · ART102A · AHIS209 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take Meyer if and writing for a fair, organized class, but if you need a light workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerReading heavyFlexible deadlinesClear onlineTough questionsWork for A
  • Online reviews are mostly positive, calling the course clear, organized, and flexible.
  • Workload is consistently , and tough questions.
  • In-person reviews are more negative, with several students describing the workload as stressful and excessive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic because he grades fairly and accepts late work, but students must keep up with , and homework.

Online reviews make the A seem more attainable, while same result.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The , and frequent chapter work.

Online organization makes the challenge easier to manage, while as tough or excessive.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Reviews show flexibility with deadlines and late work, but they do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews clearly support deadline flexibility, while in-person reviews mention late-work flexibility but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend him when they value organization and fairness, but .

Online students mostly recommend him, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

He is described as an easy or , but tough questions keep grades from feeling automatic.

Format shift

Online reviews mention easy grading and extensions, while and tough workload complaints.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and 10-15 weekly hours for an A.

Format shift

Both formats are workload-heavy, but as more stressful and severe.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Positive reviews describe him as , and interesting, though some in-person reviews are strongly negative.

Format shift

Online teaching is consistently praised, while and overwhelming.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears driven , and creative assignments rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Online reviews mention chapter assignments, quizzes, papers, and creative work, while and tough questions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed , and high weekly time demands.

Main concern

The workload can feel overwhelming and stressful in in-person sections.

What students said

“I spent 10-15 hours a week in order to get an A.”
ART102A
“He gives a lot of .”
ART103

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and fair despite a lot of reading and homework.

Main concern

The online , and chapter work.

What students said

“ and flexible.”
AHIS209
“Lots of homework and a .”
102A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but quizzes and tough questions appear regularly while .

Chapter QuizzesTough QuestionsTwo Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tough questions, but comments do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Test HeavyTough Questions
“He gives a lot of .”
ART103
“the questions he gives are hard”
ART102A

Online

, and papers, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Chapter QuizzesTwo PapersTough Questions
“Lots of homework and a .”
102A
“Two papers but we got to pick the topic and .”
ART101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and flexible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“The expectations and trajectory of the class were easy to follow which was so refreshing.”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“I spent 10-15 hours a week in order to get an A.”

⚖️

72/100

“Asks tough questions but grades well if you try.”

Theme 1

📚 About Reading And Workload

  • There is a lot reading to the course.
  • Lots of homework and a .
  • .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching And Support

  • and flexible.
  • if you need it.
  • and extends deadlines.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Difficulty

  • The class is work but not hard keep up with the and you are all set.
  • Asks tough questions but grades well if you try.
  • It was a full time job.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews give useful format contrast and consistent workload evidence, but the sample is smaller and some grades are missing.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART102A4 reviews
ART1032 reviews
102A1 review
AHIS2091 review
ART1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values