AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Aida Awainisyan

MATH · MATHEMATICS40 · CALC160 · MATHMATH · MATH40 · MATH170 · MATH400161 · MATH25 · 10A · MATH70 · ALGEBRA1A · MATH130 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are ready to teach yourself and get outside math help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandUnclear explanationsRude when questionedNeeds outside helpHarsh learning experience
  • Most reviews say students and often needed tutors or outside resources.
  • Students repeatedly describe her as .
  • A small minority mention leniency or , but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some leniency and appear in one positive review, but most students say poor teaching makes passing or earning a high grade difficult without outside help.

Online evidence says outside help is needed, while , and weak support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math itself may not always be advanced, but and .

Online evidence points to self-teaching from notes, while and hard-to-understand instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking her because they found the , and dependent on outside help.

The one online review is negative, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

One review praises and leniency, but most comments , and poor grade outcomes.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence includes both one lenient outlier and many strict negative experiences.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews focus more on confusion and outside study than on a .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews emphasize learning difficulty more than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students say , and unhelpful when questions are asked.

Format shift

Online evidence says she posts notes without explaining, while and poor question support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments mostly discuss tests, homework questions, , and needing to learn material for .

Format shift

Online evidence does not clearly describe assessments, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly report unclear explanations, difficulty understanding her, rude responses to questions, and poor learning support.

Main concern

Students may not learn enough in class and may feel discouraged when asking questions.

What students said

“WARNING! !”
MATH25
“you can't understand her at all”
MATH70
“she was rude and made you feel stupid when you asked a question.”
MATH130

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says students need outside help because .

Main concern

Online students may need a tutor or YouTube to learn the content.

What students said

“you will need lots of outside help because she posts notes and .”
MATH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but negative, with students describing vague or and .

Vague TestsDifficult TestsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or final format.

Vague TestsHard TestsExtra Credit
“ vague, like reading another language.”
MATHMATH
“You won't learn anything for test.”
120
“an insane amount of opportunities.”
MATH25

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are taking this class online, you will need lots of outside help because she posts notes and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting repeated complaints about clarity, support, and self-teaching needs. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Very hard to understand, not good at explaining the material.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“WARNING! !”

📈 Grade Difficulty

34/100

“I learned more from the tutors thn i learned in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ; which made it harder to understand the subject.
  • She should be fired because she doesn't teach math 40, she just reviews the material that she is supposed to be TEACHING.
  • not good at explaining the material.

Theme 2

❓ About Help & Questions

  • She offers to help, but .
  • she was rude and made you feel stupid when you asked a question.
  • when asked for !"

Theme 3

📚 About Self-Teaching

  • you will need lots of outside help because she posts notes and .
  • I learned more from the tutors thn i learned in class.
  • You will likely need a tutor or to watch lots of YouTube videos.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The pattern is very consistent across 20 reviews, but many reviews are old and only one .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH405 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH252 reviews
10A1 review
Show 8 more courses
1201 review
ALGEBRA1A1 review
CALC1601 review
MATH1701 review
MATH4001611 review
MATH701 review
MATHEMATICS401 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values