AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Asma Said

ASTRO20 · ASTR13 · PHYS2B · PHYS1384 · PHYS2A1384 · ASTR20 · PHYS2A · PHYSICS2A · PHY2A · CDEV104 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
35.14%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in the subject and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderConfusing LecturesHeavy WorkloadPoor CommunicationSelf-Teaching Required
  • Many students say and they had to teach themselves.
  • , and hard exams are recurring complaints.
  • and , but recent reviews are much more negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few students earned A grades, but , and a need to self-teach.

Online and online comments adding vague instructions and slow replies.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material is made harder by , fast pacing, and limited worked examples.

and lectures, while online astronomy and physics reviews emphasize unclear assignments and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and one says being late can lead to being marked absent.

, while online reviews mainly imply class participation is needed to pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and harshly graded.

Both formats include negative recommendations, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly describe her as a and strict rubrics.

Format shift

Online and , though in-person physics exams receive the harshest criticism.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of , and frequent test pressure.

Format shift

Online reviews stress heavy weekly workload, while and lab expectations.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many students say she knows the subject but teaches unclearly and often leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize poor communication and vague instructions, while and weak exam preparation.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear , and participation depending on the course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, papers, and assignments, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed historically but recent physics reviews strongly , and .

Main concern

Students often say they must self-teach while and .

What students said

“ .”
PHYS2B
“This is by far the .”
PHYS2B

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and strict grading.

Main concern

Students report poor communication and .

What students said

“ !”
ASTRO20
“Professor Said is very vague with her instructions and .”
PHYS2A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyPop QuizzesUnclear Test Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy courses, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policies.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyFinal With New Material
“ and grades super hard”
PHYS2B
“she put new material on the before we took it”
PHYSICS2A

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Pop QuizzesConfusing TestsTest Heavy
“there are a bunch of pop quizzes”
PHYS2A
“I felt like the ”
ASTRO20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and unless you want to teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She cannot teach effectively”

⚖️

18/100

“Even following rubrics and guidelines you still get a zero or the lowest grad possible.”

👍 Recommendation Level

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • there was not a single lecture where she actually explained anything
  • because she can't teach.
  • We didn't spend time in class practicing problems much so you have to do a lot of practice outside of class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She graded like it was a super high level physics class
  • The . Its the .
  • and grades super hard

Theme 3

📩 About Support

  • and .
  • Takes a very long time to respond to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 37 reviews across many years and both formats, with , and communication problems.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 512
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 511

Course coverage

PHYS2A10 reviews
ASTR206 reviews
ASTRO205 reviews
PHYS2B5 reviews
PHYSICS2A4 reviews
Show 5 more courses
PHY2A2 reviews
PHYS13842 reviews
ASTR131 review
CDEV1041 review
PHYS2A13841 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 5

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 1