AI Rate Professor

English

Summino Otsuji

ENGL1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle structured group work and want a professor who may still offer chances to improve.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GradingGroup ProjectsResubmission OpportunityCaring but Demanding
  • The only review describes heavy and .
  • , but the professor allowed a .
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A seems difficult because the only reported grade is C- and the , though resubmission helped.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course seems challenging mainly because group assignments include many required steps that students may find impractical.

Only online evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The review is mostly negative about workload design, despite noting that the professor cares about student success.

Recommendation evidence comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The and C- outcome suggest strict grading, partly softened by a .

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload appears heavy because the .

Format shift

Only the online review mentions workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

The professor shows care through resubmission, but the course design is criticized as impractical.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from the online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review discusses group assignments and a .

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review describes a demanding course with unnecessary group assignment steps but .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“she allowed me to fix and grade”
ENGL-1A
“so many unnescessary and impractical steps that we are required to follow”
ENGL-1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review mentions a but does not clearly prove the .

Final Resubmission MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“she allowed me to fix and grade”
ENGL-1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One good thing I can say is that she allowed me to fix and grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in workload and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“it demonstrates that she cares that students do well in her course”

⚖️

35/100

“she allowed me to fix and grade”

📚 Workload Design

30/100

“so many unnescessary and impractical steps that we are required to follow”

Theme 1

📚 About Assignments

  • so many unnescessary and impractical steps that we are required to follow
  • In the so many unnescessary and impractical steps

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • she allowed me to fix and grade
  • it demonstrates that she cares that students do well in her course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because the analysis relies on one review from one online course.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL-1A1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values