AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Michelle Moen

CDEV115 · CDEV108 · CD103 · CDEV107 · CDEV103 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a caring CDEV instructor and , but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots of AssignmentsClear FeedbackReal-World ExperienceOnline Risk
  • Most in-person students praise her as caring, experienced, and helpful.
  • Grades are usually fair and attainable, but students must complete a lot of work.
  • Online reviews are sharply negative and , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic with , and occasional , but it is not effortless.

In-person evidence supports a fair path to an A, while and heavier work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The content is approachable and practical in person, but long lectures and .

In-person classes seem manageable and hands-on, while online sections are described as confusing and unhelpful.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because reviews mention sign-in sheets, participation, and failing if .

In-person reviews clearly stress attendance, while online reviews do not clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and feedback, but online complaints and lecture style create real hesitation.

, while both online reviews are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and and feedback, but some students call her strict or tough.

Format shift

as fair, while online reviews describe tough grading.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is steady because students repeatedly mention lots of assignments, projects, tests, and homework.

Format shift

Both formats mention work, but online reviews frame it more negatively and .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is often described as caring, experienced, helpful, and feedback-oriented, though some students find her lectures rambling or confusing.

Format shift

In-person teaching is mostly praised, while online teaching is criticized as weak and hard to learn from.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment includes online , and participation.

Format shift

, projects, and presentations, while online evidence mentions homework, pop quizzes, and tough grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, describing her as , and .

Main concern

Classes can drag and include a lot of .

What students said

“She is a !”
CDEV103
“She does give a lot of work and projects.”
CDEV108
“There is a lot of assignments but they are not difficult, as long as you are willing to put in the work.”
CDEV115

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, saying lectures are weak, workload is high, and .

Main concern

Students say online lectures do not teach enough and the workload is heavy.

What students said

“You don't learn from lectures at all.”
CDEV107
“Don't even bother taking a class with his professor.”
CDEV115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mostly student-friendly, with open-book open-note tests and an .

Open BookOpen NotesWeekly Online TestsEasy Final Presentation

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-book open-note tests, weekly online tests, and an .

Open BookOpen NotesWeekly Online TestsEasy Final Presentation
“they are all open book open notes.”
CDEV103
“ ”
CD103
“the final is a 2 min. presentation with a prop super easy.”
CD103

Online

and pop quizzes but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring requirements.

Pop Quizzes
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CDEV115

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a lot of assignments but they are not difficult, as long as you are willing to put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“She assigns a lot of work, but that's expected from any child development class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a lot of experience in the field of early childhood education, and constantly talks about her experiences.
  • and and is very understanding about personal issues.
  • She is dedicated and prepared.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not a .
  • Participate, do your work, you'll be fine!
  • There are lots of assignments but .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Weak Spots

  • You don't learn from lectures at all.
  • She does give a lot of work and projects.
  • she talks a lot about Minnesota

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews include , and a consistent split between strong in-person praise and online criticism.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CDEV1154 reviews
CDEV1033 reviews
CDEV1083 reviews
CD1032 reviews
CDEV1072 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1