AI Rate Professor

English

Cindy Tino-Sandoval

ENG1A · ENG6342 · ENGL1A6306 · ENGLISH1A · ENGB · ENG27 · ENG25A · HIST101 · ENG25 · ENGL25A · ENGLISH1C · ENGLISH1B · ENGLI6341 · ENGL1A · ENG4321 · ENGLI1B · ENGLI6342 · ENG1B · ENGLI1A · ENG1C · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid if , but self-directed students may pass by attending, reading, and participating.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDisorganizedLecture HeavySlow FeedbackAttendance Matters
  • Many students describe confusing organization, off-topic lectures, and .
  • some students call it an easy A, while many report harsh or .
  • Attendance and participation matter heavily, even when students find lectures boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible for students who attend, read, participate, and stay on her good side, but many reviews describe harsh or .

, while in-person evidence is split between easy-A claims and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The English content is often described as basic or repetitive, but and .

Online reviews emphasize disorganization, while , and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many students say skipping or missing lectures hurts your chance to pass, and participation is repeatedly emphasized.

Online evidence is limited but one review flags skipping as a problem; and participation matter.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend her because they see the class as , and unfair.

Both online reviews are negative, and the older positive comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

on participation and personal rapport.

Format shift

Online reviews describe harsh comments, while and favoritism.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students report many papers, reading, quizzes, and long essays, though some older reviews call the assignments manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews stress many papers, while and essay work.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students often describe lectures as , and slow, with a minority praising her as caring or funny.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as disorganized and unsupportive, while but has some positive older reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven mainly by essays, papers, reading quizzes, participation, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and written work more than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly , and inconsistent organization.

Main concern

The main risk is unclear teaching paired with tough or .

What students said

“Her lectures are pointless, the whole class she just goes over and re-reads all of the hw we did the night before.”
ENG1A
“Takes forever to give graded work back.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and little help for struggling students.

Main concern

Students say the and is hard to survive.

What students said

“ and can be very snarky in her emails and comments.”
ENG1A
“Whatever .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and , but the overall exam policy is not clearly proven across sections.

Take-Home FinalBook QuizzesFew Tests MentionedPolicy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but not enough consistent detail to prove a standard exam policy.

Take-Home FinalBook Quizzes
“Gives 4 essays 4 pgs min. and a .”
ENGLI1B
“Pretty much a couple quizes from the reading, 3 short essays, the research paper that every Eng1A student will have to do, and a .”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Her lectures are pointless, the whole class she just goes over and re-reads all of the hw we did the night before.”

⚖️

30/100

“Grades tough for no reason on the smallest things.”

👍 Recommendation Level

30/100

“ if you can”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Talks very slow and all in one tone.
  • She has to be the .
  • Goes off topic a lot but it isn't intended.

Theme 2

📄

  • same day and takes a month to grade it.
  • .
  • So many papers

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • it's possible to get an easy A with this professor.
  • us to be perfect.
  • but if she likes you, you will get a good grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is credible because 50 reviews span many years and show repeated patterns, though older comments are more positive than recent ones.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 511
1 out of 518

Course coverage

ENG1A14 reviews
ENG1C8 reviews
ENGLISH1A4 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENGLISH1C3 reviews
Show 15 more courses
ENG1B2 reviews
ENG43212 reviews
ENGLI1A2 reviews
ENG251 review
ENG25A1 review
ENG271 review
ENG63421 review
ENGB1 review
ENGL1A63061 review
ENGL25A1 review
ENGLI1B1 review
ENGLI63411 review
ENGLI63421 review
ENGLISH1B1 review
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1