AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David Ramirez

MATH150 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to teach yourself difficult math and rely on to survive.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTough GraderSelf-Teaching RequiredExtra CreditGroup Projects
  • Most students and require self-teaching.
  • Grades are difficult, but may help students pass.
  • A minority says he cares and helps if students put in serious effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Grades require major effort and self-teaching, though can prevent failure for some students.

All evidence comes from in-person MATH150 reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content feels hard because students and they must learn material alone.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it consistently describes the course as difficult to learn.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules or .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because and .

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with one positive review outweighed by several strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call him a , though can soften the final outcome.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe strict grading or reliance on .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention lots of , and heavy self-teaching outside class.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews , and leaves students teaching themselves.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with one caring-professor review outweighed by repeated confusion complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention , and , suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and assessment details are scattered across comments and tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing , tough grading, lots of self-teaching, and as a safety net.

Main concern

Students struggle because the while .

What students said

“Had to because and couldn't really read his writing.”
MATH150
“ if you intend to teach most of the material to yourself because .”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and pop quizzes, but do not clearly .

Tests MentionedPop QuizzesPolicy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, proctored, or standardized.

Tests MentionedPop Quizzes
“Uses ChatGPT for tests, and yet always has typos.”
MATH150
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you intend to teach most of the material to yourself because .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching burden. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He doesn't actually teach in a way that people truly understand what he's saying.”

⚖️

25/100

“And yet he's a .”

📈 Effort Required

30/100

“without them majority of the class would not pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does NOT teach, he blabs about nothing, then sporadically writes things on the board and .
  • , so I never asked questions.
  • his teaching style makes it very difficult to learn.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty & Self-Teaching

  • Had to because and couldn't really read his writing.
  • you'll end up having to teach yourself everything anyways.
  • if you intend to teach most of the material to yourself because .

Theme 3

🧾 About Grading &

  • he's a .
  • There are many opportunities and without them majority of the class would not pass.
  • He does everything to ensure his students pass, but you need to put in the same amount of effort.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 6 reviews, but they are detailed and mostly consistent across recent and older comments.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1506 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B- 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values