AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Gerardo Flores

N222 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are prepared for and can learn actively beyond lecture.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavyTough graderLecture heavyMixed experienceHigh workload
  • Student experiences are sharply split between one excellent review and one very negative review.
  • The , and lectures that did not help tests.
  • Success , and tolerance for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

One student earned an A, but the detailed , and a narrow grading structure.

All evidence comes from In person reviews, with no Online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course appears intellectually and structurally difficult because .

Only In person evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but participation is emphasized and classes are described as long.

Only In person evidence exists, and it does not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Recommendation depends on student fit because one review is very positive while another describes a .

Only In person evidence exists, and it is highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

The and passing requires 75 percent or higher.

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The course is described as , and four-hour classes in eight weeks.

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

, but the strongest detailed comment says lectures were useless and misaligned with tests.

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

95/100

Both reviews tag the class as test heavy, and one describes six 100-point exams.

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews are divided, with one student praising access and participation while another describes an .

Main concern

, and poorly aligned with lecture or homework.

What students said

“Read, Participate, Ask”
N222
“8 week course of hell”
144

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser rules, but they show a .

Six ExamsNo Half CreditTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person , but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or final format rules.

Six ExamsNo Half CreditTest Heavy
“Six 100pt exams that only have 50?s”
144
“Does not give half credit for ”
144
“ ”
144

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“8 week course of hell”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“4hr classes with the most useless lectures”

⚖️

20/100

“Does not give half credit for ”

🧪

25/100

“Six 100pt exams that only have 50?s”

Theme 1

🧪 About Exams

  • Six 100pt exams that only have 50?s
  • Stated that Exam 6 failed every semester

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Read, Participate, Ask
  • 4hr classes with the most useless lectures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only two reviews, but they include recent evidence and one detailed negative account.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

1441 review
N2221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values