AI Rate Professor

English

Robert Jones

ENGL100 · ENG1A · 1A · ENG1C · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and rewards steady writing effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed feedbackCaring mentorFair gradingWriting improvementFlexible support
  • Students and say it improves their writing.
  • and in-person reviews, with a 100 percent would-take-again signal.
  • Workload is reasonable, and as fair or and writing expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students report A , and fair grading with manageable effort.

Online evidence highlights flexibility and resubmission, while in-person evidence adds easy or .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The class requires reading and writing, but , and .

Online evidence describes reasonable work, while , and writing growth.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation matters appears often, but reviews do .

Online and in-person reviews support engagement but do not show a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every would-take-again review is , and visible writing improvement.

Both online and review especially praising flexibility.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe him as fair, easy at times, and willing and resubmission.

Format shift

Online evidence shows resubmission flexibility, while and .

Workload

Light

76/100

The workload is described as reasonable, with expected reading, papers, small quizzes, and writing assignments.

Format shift

Online evidence directly says the work is reasonable, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently praise , and ability to improve writing.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize responsiveness and flexibility, while , and writing growth.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears centered , and small quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to writing-based assessment, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and ability to make students better writers.

Main concern

Some students mention , but the tone remains strongly positive.

What students said

“I came out of his class a better writer for sure.”
ENG1A
“he is very fair and really wants you to succeed.”
ENG1C
“Gives *paragraphs* of feedback and really wants you to pass”
1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review describes quick email responses, flexible essay support, resubmission opportunities, and reasonable work.

Main concern

Online evidence is very positive but comes from only one review.

What students said

“ and was flexible with meeting with me .”
ENG1C
“gave me a chance to resubmit work after the due date.”
ENG1C
“Reasonable amount of work.”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tiny quizzes, but do not clearly prove a .

PapersTiny Quizzes
“ . and there.”
1A

Online

The online review discusses essays and resubmissions but does not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book exams.

Essay-Based Work
“gave me a chance to resubmit work after the due date.”
ENG1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gives *paragraphs* of feedback and really wants you to pass by giving you all the info tailored to you in order to do so.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“I came out of his class a better writer for sure.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ .”

✍️

92/100

“Also provided and gave me a chance to resubmit work after the due date.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He cares about your learning and .
  • he was a great professor.
  • Loved him!!

Theme 2

✍️

  • I came out of his class a better writer for sure.
  • Gives *paragraphs* of feedback and really wants you to pass
  • Also provided

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Workload

  • Reasonable amount of work.
  • he is really tough and grades like you wouldn't believe, but he is very fair

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are only 5 reviews, but they are detailed and highly consistent across several years and both formats.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1C2 reviews
1A1 review
ENG1A1 review
ENGL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1