AI Rate Professor

Social & Behavioral Sciences

Joe Georges

PHILOSOPHY8 · PHIL8 · PS1 · POLSCI1 · INTROTOLOGIC · PHIL106 · PSCI · LOGIC8 · POLI1 · POLISCI1 · POLI14188 · PHIL2732 · PS101 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can keep up with reading and steady deadlines, but if you need a very light or low-structure class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when engagedReading-heavyFast-paced online workMixed grading experiencesChallenging logic material
  • Students often praise his knowledge, clarity, and willingness to help.
  • Online courses can be fast-paced with , and exams.
  • Grades can be very manageable when students keep up, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A is realistic for , and complete the steady work, but it is not effortless.

Online evidence shows more easy-A claims tied to keeping up, while and more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Political science is manageable, but logic courses and fast online pacing add real challenge.

Online reviews emphasize pace and workload, while and lecture style.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Attendance policy is not consistently described, though and participation mattered.

Online reviews mention required discussions and some campus finals, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

69/100

and fair effort-based results, but several strongly warn against him for workload and grading.

Online recommendation is polarized, while but often based on older comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Some reviews call his grading lenient or fair, but and .

Format shift

grader, while in-person reviews mostly describe fair but sometimes difficult tests.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Reviews frequently mention , and finals.

Format shift

Online reviews show the heavier workload pattern, while and studying but less frequent task detail.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many students describe him as , and helpful, though .

Format shift

Online reviews praise help and feedback but are more polarized, while and clarity with some lecture complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear , and finals rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online courses clearly use mixed assessments, while , and occasional writing choices.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and mixed, praising knowledge and clarity while criticizing boring lectures and uneven teaching style.

Main concern

Some students found lectures slow, boring, or disconnected from the book.

What students said

“ .”
PHILOSOPHY8
“His lectures are very, very, very boring.”
POLSCI1
“ , but the .”
INTROTOLOGIC

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with many strong outcomes for organized students and several complaints about heavy workload and difficult exams.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“The class is fast paced with discussion posts and quiz's every 3 or 4 days at a time.”
POLISCI1
“Easy A if you do the work.”
POLISCI1
“Weekly online hw, 3 online exams, 1 final in person.”
PHIL106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, with some textbook-based or open-book tests and some hard closed-book or .

Textbook-Based QuizzesMidterm And FinalIn-Person Final For Some Online CoursesClosed-Book Final EvidenceOpen-Book Test Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some open-book tests, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy.

Medium Difficulty TestsTough ExamsOpen-Book Test Evidence
“ , but the .”
INTROTOLOGIC
“ .”
POLISCI1
“otherwise, do the work, blog, and and it can be an easy A!”
PS1

Online

, and one explicitly closed-book in-person final, but do not prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

Weekly QuizzesMidterm And FinalIn-Person FinalClosed-Book Final Evidence
“This was an online class and he actually made us show up to campus for the and note.”
PHIL106
“Weekly online hw, 3 online exams, 1 final in person.”
PHIL106
“His finals and and .”
POLISCI1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“One of the CSU.”

📈 Effort And Grades

64/100

“Easy A if you do the work.”

⚖️ Workload Risk

34/100

“Assignments and quizzes due every 3-4 days.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Georges is very clear and as complex as philosophy.
  • Mr. Georges is incredibly knowledgeable on the subject.
  • His lectures are very, very, very boring.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Difficulty

  • . You need to keep up.
  • There is and lots of it.
  • The but the .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Easy A if you do the work.
  • Not an easy A but could definitely get a solid B, plus a few opportunities..
  • I worked really hard and I'm an A student and I still got a B.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 35 reviews across many years and both formats, with rich but .

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

POLI19 reviews
PHIL1066 reviews
POLISCI16 reviews
PHIL83 reviews
POLSCI13 reviews
Show 8 more courses
INTROTOLOGIC1 review
LOGIC81 review
PHIL27321 review
PHILOSOPHY81 review
POLI141881 review
PS11 review
PS1011 review
PSCI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values