AI Rate Professor

English

Alfred Zucker

ENGLISH101 · ENG1A · ENGLI101 · HIST1B · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENG100 · ENGL1C · ENG102 · ENGL1B · ENG6301 · ENG1 · ENG101 · ENGL1A · ENGLI1C · ENG14 · ENG1B · ENGLI1A · ENG1C · 110 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

, but if you want rigorous writing instruction or detailed feedback.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy gradingStory-heavy lecturesCaring but unfocusedWeak writing feedbackPaper-based class
  • Many students say the class is an easy A or B with lenient deadlines and few assignments.
  • Teaching quality is highly divisive because lectures often become long personal stories instead of writing instruction.
  • Students who need concrete feedback or structured writing help are often disappointed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Most students describe the class as very easy with , and grades earned through basic papers or effort.

The , while the single online review reports more weekly paper workload and tougher feedback issues.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course content is usually described as easy and low-pressure, though students may not learn much writing structure.

In-person reviews strongly support an easy course, while the lone but not hard concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

86/100

Several reviews describe extreme deadline flexibility and one says he .

Attendance flexibility is supported by in-person reviews, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

and kindness, but not for students who want clear teaching, communication, or writing improvement.

and teaching complaints, while the single online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

93/100

Students repeatedly say he grades easily, accepts late work, and makes passing simple.

Format shift

, while the lone online review calls him a tough grader but lacks enough weight to override the pattern.

Workload

Light

79/100

The workload is mostly papers and reading, often described as .

Format shift

In-person reviews often describe light work, while the online .

Teaching experience

Average

51/100

Students often call him kind and caring, but many say , and does not teach writing well.

Format shift

, while the single online review is clearly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades , and peer or committee evaluation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to paper-based assessment, with the online review explicitly .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

class with caring intentions but inconsistent teaching value.

Main concern

Students often report rambling lectures and .

What students said

“Easiest grade ever, he didn't care about due dates, allowed for .”
HIST1B
“He basically told the same stories over and over again that had nothing to do with English at all.”
ENG1A
“ and telling you how to fix it and make it better.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review , and weekly papers rather than normal homework.

Main concern

Communication and .

What students said

“He does so I had to ask him in zoom class and he would not tell me what to work on.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and in-class essays, and they do not clearly prove a .

Paper-Based GradingIn-Class EssaysFew Exam DetailsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some in-class essays, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam format or proctoring policy.

PapersIn-Class EssaysPeer-Graded Papers
“Only grades the and the two in .”
ENG1A
“ and 3 professors.”
ENGL1A
“8 essays 2 in class. 1 10pg research paper.”
ENG1A

Online

The online review mentions only papers and does not clearly prove .

Paper-Based GradingNo Clear Exam Policy
“There is .”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easiest but . I didn't learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

51/100

“He didn't actually teach us anything and spent most of his time napping at his desk.”

📈 Easy Grade

92/100

“Easiest grade ever, he didn't care about due dates, allowed for .”

❤️ Student Support

56/100

“He really cares about his students and is willing to go any length to see them succeed and ultimately understand the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He told stories about his life the entire time, repeating himself FAR too often.
  • His lectures are very entertaining and truly help you understand the material.
  • He basically told the same stories over and over again that had nothing to do with English at all.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you're looking for a easy A, .
  • You can basically BS your work and you'll get a decent grade.
  • It is very hard to attain an A in his class.

Theme 3

📝 And Papers

  • and unhelpful.
  • . NONE.
  • and telling you how to fix it and make it better.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

110

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews with repeated, detailed themes, though and spans many older years.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 514
3 out of 519
2 out of 514
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG1A14 reviews
1A5 reviews
ENG1014 reviews
ENG1C4 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
Show 15 more courses
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG12 reviews
ENGL1B2 reviews
ENGLI1012 reviews
63811 review
ENG1001 review
ENG1021 review
ENG141 review
ENG1B1 review
ENG63011 review
ENGL1C1 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLI1C1 review
ENGLISH1011 review
HIST1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 4 · Not_Sure_Yet 1